1 yr. ago • 80%

Bethesda: Thank you to more than 10 million Starfield explorers for creating the biggest launch in Bethesda history

https:// twitter.com /bethesda/status/1704246657011867931

53 comments

Up to 87 hours warts and all. Have played through some great quests. Also found plenty of bugs and annoyances, but overall it's great. The random procedural quests are a nice addition, a call back to Daggerfall. The space combat is an ok addition. Bases are the big waste of time here, but you don't really need to do one. There are lots of nice shoutouts to your character after doing certains quests, including NG+. (Few things that don't make sense, and they could've pushed it farther -

spoiler

like does it makes sense to join the Crimson Fleet in the Razorleaf, better to have cut out that questline for that play thru IMO

) Overall quite satisifed and i'm enjoying it a lot. I can see getting to 100 hours easily without mods.

9
- After 80 hours, I encountered a clear bug.
  
  None of the security guards had armor, just walking around shirtless.
  
  Loved it.
  
  6
  
  I just talked to a guy who was facing away from me, well his head was looking at the wall while his body was pointed at me. It was..disconcerting..(and amusing!)
  
  5
*on GamePass, God knows what the launch would look like if it wasn't practically free

-2
- Gamepass is not free
  
  5
Would be more, if it wasn't an exclusive.

EDIT: To clarify, all of the console exclusivity is absolute bullshit and does nothing positive for those who enjoy games, nor does it serve any necessary purpose - it's just a weapon for businesses to use against each other.

-9
- God of War. Spiderman. Horizon. Last of Us. Ghost of Tsushima. Bloodborne. Uncharted. Ratchet and Clank. Death Stranding. Grand Turismo. Persona.
  
  13
  
  Add Final Fantasy. Would also have more if they weren't exclusive.
  
  8
  
  Spite always creates a better system.
  
  1
- Definitely, though it can be said for every exclusive game.
  
  6
  
  Agreed. Exclusives are complete bullshit, regardless of vendor.
  
  6
- It's not an exclusive, it's just not on Playstation or Switch. When did people decide PC releases didn't count?
  
  2
  
  Windows is made by Microsoft. Would you feel better if people called Starfield a “Microsoft exclusive”?
  
  2
  
  Generally, "exclusive" in this context is referring to exclusivity on a console involved in the (IMO completely unnecessary) console wars.
  
  I do agree that PC is an important item there too but, the problems there are a bit different - for example shoddy ports (no justification for porting from x86/amd64 consoles to PC to be bad), excessive and intrusive DRM, and unreasonable delay or unwillingness to port.
  
  2
Gamers keep getting dumber and dumber. I figured anyone with two brain cells to rub together would see this would be a shit game

-42
- Oh fuck right off, let people enjoy the game.
  
  18
  
  As if I’m putting a gun to anyone’s head preventing them from doing so
  
  -14
- Why is it shit?
  
  11
  
  Outdated engine, non existend optimization, mediocre writing, lacking ship travel, dead looking NPCs, general Bethesda bugginess, lack of DLSS support
  
  -9
- The only game that scratches the space exploration itch Elite doesn't quite scratch (I mean, Elite is very good, but has it's shortcomings when it comes to on-foot stuff). Ship interiors, base building and having actual life on planets, not just some fungoida and bacterium patches, alone are a reason to be excited about Starfield. Also, jetpack combat.
  
  Funny how Elder Scrolls veterans are enjoying the game for what it is while bitter Playstation diehards, wishful thinkers with gigabyte-sized dreams.txt and bandwagon-o'-hate jumpers are complaining about things that never were to be so loud you can clearly hear the "Reeeeeeeeeee...." from Alpha Centauri😏
  
  8
- I've actually been really enjoying it. It's a pleasant universe to just get absorbed in.
  
  Sure, it's got a lot of very valid complaints (performance, UX etc.) but they matter less to me the more I get into it. Writing is not groundbreaking, but it gets pretty good. Since very good voice acting from otherwise random NPCs.
  
  Also the first game I've played that lets me use non-binary pronouns as a third option, rather than just Gendered or not. Very cool and I hope to see more games do that.
  
  I'd say the most disappointing thing is how straightforward almost every quest is. They don't do what Obsidian does in games like New Vegas and Outer Worlds where lots of quests have multiple resolutions, some hidden. In this game if it's not in the objective list it's usually not an option. It's the typical Bethesda experience of course, rather than Obsidian's, so it's still nice for what it is.
  
  It's the closest I've personally felt to exploring and interacting with the worlds of Mass Effect 1 and Knights of the Old Republic in a long time. It's got that sense of wander about it for me.
  
  7
  
  Yeah the straightforward quests are sometimes a little disappointing.
  
  I.e. there's a tiny side quest where you have to get some rich guys wedding ring back from his fiance. You go to the fiance and that say that they saw the rich guy cheating (having a conversation) with the waiter at their favorite restaurant, and that they shouldn't have to give the ring back.
  
  I went back to the rich guy to find out if this was true, and to insert myself firmly into their drama, but there was no new dialogue from the rich guy. I just had to pick a dialogue option to either take the ring or let the fiance keep it.
  
  It would have been nice to be able to confirm my suspicions that they were just being friendly with the waiter, not cheating, and maybe get the two back together. But no it was go to person A, get quest, speak to person B, return with ring/update that they are keeping it.
  
  There are some great quests, and lots of cool world building, but the RP portion is sometimes a bit lacking compared to (as you mentioned) New Vegas.
  
  3
- Internet commenters keep getting dumber and dumber. I figured anyone with two brain cells to rub together would see that human beings can understand nuance and that not everyone likes or dislikes the same things and that the entire game is not 100% objectively bad.
  
  6
  
  People tend to think on black and white and not grayscale.
  
  If you objectively compare the mechanics, writings and factions to fallout 4, Starfield is almost a direct upgrade from fallout 4 in several aspects. Gunplay, gun customization, rpg check choices that play more role in having a unique experience, factions that arent totally terribly written like it is in FO4, where almost all factions are unlikable or not interesting.
  
  The people who are let down by starfield expected bethesda to not make a bethesda game in simple terms.
  
  Do i think its GOTY material, hell no (im basically at the point of no return point in the game). Its a helluva lot better than FO4, but people treat the game like it killed their first child.
  
  1
- Them down votes, though....
  
  0
  
  Lots of buyers remorse from bethesda paypigs
  
  -1

You've viewed 53 comments.