108cm is squarely within the range of dwarfism so, as a minority, I wouldn't be surprised if the data the user is searching for is scarce or missing altogether.
Hence the result pictured.
That said, the person searching this could have just made a typo for 180cm, which is much more common.
Why am I analysing the meme? Who knows.
36ReplyWell overthinking things is generally quite fun, at least until it's not.
5Reply
Your weight is positive? Aren't you ashamed to go out of the house with such a body
13ReplyThe fatso didn't leave the house, but ate it from whithin.
2Reply
Checks out.
8ReplyPff, you youngsters and your high tech.
2Reply
Damn, better watch your diet extra carefully on holidays too, that's a very tight window.
7ReplyThis week on Extreme weight loss
6ReplyHave you tried, you know, just not existing?
4ReplyNot terribly surprising that the algorithm fails for dwarfs.
4ReplyAll my life i thought i was underweight
This post says i am in the healthy weight range(ignore the height) and people cant lie on the internet
4ReplyThe first zero is missing the units.
3ReplyThe latter is just an unsigned int that got a little too excited
3ReplyFor comparison, Peter Dinklage is 135cm, Joe C (hype man for Kid Rock) was 114cm, and Verne Troyer was 81cm.
3ReplySomehow I'm not surprised the tallest one is the must successful
1Reply