How Telegram Became a Playground for Criminals, Extremists and Terrorists
How Telegram Became a Playground for Criminals, Extremists and Terrorists
Drug dealers, scammers and white nationalists openly conduct business and spread toxic speech on the platform, according to a Times analysis of more than 3.2 million Telegram messages.
Telegram has become a global sewer of criminal activity, disinformation, child sexual abuse material, terrorism and racist incitement, according to a four-month investigation by The New York Times that analyzed more than 3.2 million Telegram messages from over 16,000 channels. The company, which offers features that enable criminals, terrorists and grifters to organize at scale and to sidestep scrutiny from the authorities, has looked the other way as illegal and extremist activities have flourished openly on the app.
The degree to which Telegram has been inundated by such content has not been previously reported. The Times investigation found 1,500 channels operated by white supremacists who coordinate activities among almost one million people around the world. At least two dozen channels sold weapons. In at least 22 channels with more than 70,000 followers, MDMA, cocaine, heroin and other drugs were advertised for delivery to more than 20 countries.
Hamas, ISIS and other terror groups have thrived on Telegram, often amassing large audiences across dozens of channels.
How Parking Garages Became a Playground for Criminals, Extremists and Terrorists
How Public Parks Became a Playground for Criminals, Extremists and Terrorists
How the Street Became a Playground for Criminals, Extremists and Terrorists
How Literal Playgrounds Became a Playground for Criminals, Extremists and Terrorists
Maybe if these things are happening everywhere, it's not the app that's the issue. This kind of talk opens us up to bans on Signal and similar apps, and that's just unacceptable. Address the core issues in society, don't try (and typically fail) to bandage it by taking away more and more of people's rights and freedoms.
30The New York Times that analyzed more than 3.2 million Telegram messages from over 16,000 channels
They even admit that they did this research on public channels which never had encryption available to them on Telegram.
That's like going on a bunch of open Discord servers and doing the same kind of research and coming to the same conclusions, even though Discord doesn't even offer end-to-end encryption.
Arguably, Discord does more moderation of the types of groups in question, but at the same time, moderation is difficult, and acting like groups don't "fall through the cracks" of Discord's moderation is naive.
Telegram sucks, in my humble opinion, but I agree, this article seems more aimed at creating the narrative that only criminals use anything that has any encryption offerings, not that criminal activity happens anywhere and everywhere.
13
This article reeks of propaganda. "We've done the analysis and trust us, only crooks use telegram! Look! there are DOZENS of terrorist chanels!"
I know telegram is shite, but isn't it strange that western governments seem to have it in for it lately?
23I already thought Telegram was some kind of honeypot, but this US using it as a reverse-honeypot to villainize encryption in general is fucking wild when it doesn't even offer e2ee by default or in group chats.
10Telegram is the new TikTok. They don't like it because they can't control the conversations
5Manufacturing consent.
3
This coming from the same people who want to monitor everything I do or say.
9I just use Telegram with friends and family as an alternative to sms. I'll have to ask if any of them are selling drugs, because it would be handy to have a connection.
7Media Bias/Fact Check - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Media Bias/Fact Check:
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceNew York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for New York Times:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source-9