Millenials being accused of not pumping out enough babies when we can't even support ourselves

The people linking kids to capitalism im dead bruh 💀

6

Millennials and Gen-Z are truly the lost generation.

Imagine still living with parents in your late twenties or even early thirties because you simply cannot afford to even rent your own place. Now imagine that work pays like shit and you are busting your ass working long hours to chase an eternal pipe dream of economic prosperity. You can't even seek psychiatric help for your ailing mental health because it's expensive, inaccessible and oversubscribed.

For a man, being in that situation makes you downright undateable so it's not like you can rely on the joint incomes that couples do either.

And we wonder why toxic masculinity is on the rise...

The rich have done a smash & grab on the economy and made everybody poorer as a result of their own greed. It's a dangerous game.

2

If you wanted the younger generation to continue producing workers for the capitalist machine, you should have made sure that potential parents had enough resources to actually maintain a family if they started one.

But yeah, that would have slightly reduced quarterly profits, and we can't have that kind of long-sightedness messing with the short-term returns of our shareholders.

2

Population growth is a pyramid scheme.

1

Shit, until the west falls, I'm staying rubber'd up and preferably, in the guts of other men rather than doing some shit that can accidentally saddle me with an 18-year money sink in a country that already wants my every last dollar; since that whole 'reversible vasectomy' thing sounds both too good to be true, and outside of my current capability for expenditure.

0

You have a way with words my occasional butt cowboy.

1

Can't think of any particular reason we need to replace the US population. It seems like we've done enough.

0

EXACTLY. The entire fucking world is overpopulated. This is like one of the only good things going on right now on a large scale.

1
- This isnt actually true.
  
  The surface area of just the land alone on Earth is more than enough to house every human alive right now. Its actually more than enough to house every human that ever lived since the dawn of human history on it with room to spare according to expert calculations. The global population didnt even hit 1 billion people until like 1800. Now, if you subtract out all the currently unlivable areas because of nuclear radiation and harsh weather and such, you're still going to have enough land for every human alive right now to live comfortably.
  
  Its just that modern humans hate the idea of living so spread out, and apparently all want to be stacked into the same 10 miles of land. Also, governments charge money for land, they're not giving that away for free.
  
  EDIT: In case you or someone else wants to check exact math, heres the data:
  
  Earth Land Area: 148,326,000 square km (this is actually only 30% of the Earths total surface area, the other 70% is covered by water)
  
  Human population (total since dawn of humanity, estimated): ~110,000,000,000
  
  Human population (current) ~8,000,000,000
  
  My estimations put it at around 15,000 square feet per person ever born, or approximately 200,000 square feet per person alive right now.
  
  -1

It's fucked that there's even a "replacement level" in the first place

That's so fucking dystopian

Edit: typo

0

it's pretty simple actually, 2.1, a pair to make baby + 0.1 for unforeseen circumstance

1

The part I don't understand is why it's important to hit the "replacement level". Wouldn't it be better for the planet if there were fewer people living on it and competing for resources?

0

If there's less people than jobs it's easier to ask for better wages.

1
but then the megacorporations can't hit their iNfInItE gRoWtH and we can't keep making the billionaires richer.

1