Meta Follows Elon Musk’s Lead, Moves Staffers to Billionaire-Friendly Texas
Meta Follows Elon Musk’s Lead, Moves Staffers to Billionaire-Friendly Texas

Meta Follows Elon Musk’s Lead, Moves Staffers to Billionaire-Friendly Texas

Meta Follows Elon Musk’s Lead, Moves Staffers to Billionaire-Friendly Texas
Meta Follows Elon Musk’s Lead, Moves Staffers to Billionaire-Friendly Texas
Honestly, I’m all for tech continuing to move to Texas. Want to make Texas blue? Keep sending tech jobs there.
I hate to wreck this beautiful dream, but tech is not nearly as blue as everyone thinks it is.
I've never spent time around big tech types where the split wasn't 30% libertarians, 30% right-wingers, and 30% american-style liberals.
The problem there is the libertarians land all over the damn spectrum but you end up basically the same place you do everywhere else: it's a 50/50 split.
And let's be honest, the expectation here is that a lot of the employees won't move.
If the goal is to avoid "liberal bias", or whatever, moving the people from California to Texas won't do a damn thing. What you do is you move the jobs somewhere unpalatable, knowing full well this will let you do a mass layoff without it being a layoff, because people "chose" not to move to where their job is.
So we're going to get a couple of jobs, but they're going to be filled by people already here.
Texas here. There was an influx of techie movers from blue states during the pandemic. Abbott won. Trump won. Even Rafael Cruz won, and no body likes that guy.
On the bright side, Zuck's influence on California politics is going to drastically decrease.
I'm in IT. One of my coworkers has said he's farther right than Limbaugh. He's otherwise a really nice guy. 🤷
Can H-1B visa workers vote in the election?
Depends on which team you ask.
We'd need to get out and fucking vote first. Mark my words, Abbott is getting reelected with fewer votes than Kamala Harris.
I think that California should take keeping itself competitive as a tech center more-seriously. I think that a lot of what has made California competitive for tech is because it had tech from earlier, and that at a certain threshold, it becomes advantageous to do more companies in an area -- you have a pool of employees and investors and such. But what matters is having a sufficiently-large pool, and if you let that advantage erode sufficiently, your edge also goes away.
We were just talking about high California electricity prices, for example. A number of datacenters have shifted out of California because the cost of electricity is a significant input. Now, okay -- you don't have to be right on top of your datacenters to be doing tech work. You can run a Silicon Valley-based company that has its hardware in Washington state, but it's one more factor that makes it less appealing to be located in California.
The electricity price issue came up a lot back when people were talking about Bitcoin mining more, since there weren't a whole lot of inputs and it's otherwise pretty location-agnostic.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/30/this-map-shows-the-best-us-states-to-mine-for-bitcoin.html
(Prices are higher now everywhere, as this was before the COVID-19-era inflation, but the fact that California is still expensive electricity-wise remains.)
I think that there is a certain chunk of California that is kind of under the impression that the tech industry in California is a magic cash cow that is always going to be there, no matter what California does, and I think that that's kind of a cavalier approach to take.
EDIT: COVID-19's remote-working also did a lot to seriously hurt California here, since a lot of people decided "if I don't have to pay California cost-of-living and can still keep the same job, why should I pay those costs?" and just moved out of state. If you look at COVID-19-era population-change data in counties around the San Francisco Bay Area, it saw a pretty remarkable drop.
https://www.apricitas.io/p/california-is-losing-tech-jobs