A word that western media will keep refusing to use
I find it infuriating how the west never recognizes the fact that what israel is doing to the Palestinians is a genocide. Every nation, institution or person that willfully ignores this genocide and the fact that israel should face UN intervention for it is complicit.
And they've long gone past the retaliation of "an eye for an eye"
The worst is that we're still not offering a solution for this decades-old conflict, there must be a way to please both sides ! That's what our medias should talk about instead of always act as a powerless spectator or judge, where is the list of solutions, why don't we all know about the different possibilities ? Our actions only aim for the prolongation of the best outcome for us and the worst outcome for them, that's not fair and they have every right to hate us for this injustice. Once again, how to resolve permanently&virtuously this conflict should be the main topic 'on our televisions'/'in our newspapers', so that our leaders make the right/just/correct decision.
[...] genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group [...]
So technically political groups are not covered by it.
And an other word that they would refuse to attribute to fighters from our side, but would hate you if you refuse to use it for the fighters of the other side :