π = πͺ²
π = πͺ²
π = πͺ²
βAlmost allβ means that if you pull six-legged animals names outnof a hat youβre nearly guaranteed to find an insect. Doesnβt mean you canβt pull the non-insect first try, and doesnβt mean that centaurs must be insects.
This bias is to biology only found in our experience. What if theres an alien physiology that ruins this argument.
I'd argue centaur world is its own tree of life until proof exists that earth life and centaur world life had a common ancestor.
sigh Okay scientist, you can look at my dragon dick
... For science
"Wait, what's the mould for?"
Exactly.
No alien species counts as an animal taxinomically. A similar extraterrestrial ecosystem would likely result in reclassifications to add planet of greatest ancestral origin. Life seeders would make taxonomy even harder.
They'd still be an arthropod even if they weren't a species of insect. So I guess the question is whether all six-legged arthropods have ovipositors. Sounds likely.
This feels like a targeted attack on parts of booktok. Has there been a counter-offensive, and where is the popcorn?
Convergent evolution is a lie! Don't believe Big Evolution Department!
So are dragons. Unless they don't have front legs, but they they're wyverns.
Griffins an a few other mythical creatures would be too. Pegasus may or may not. The original was sired by Poseidon and itself was a god, but its since become a generic name for winged horses so that leaves room for debate.
Yes I do enjoy fiction taxonomy, why do ask?
Angels in most renditions have bird wings (i.e. arms) growing from their backs in addition to normal arms and legs.
Depends on the wings. If they're back mounted, I'm not sure they count. They don't count for insects. We don't say flies have 8 limbs.
They could be extensions of the scapula. This would make the renditions where pegasus appears to be galloping while flying more accurate.
Drakes have no wings.