New teddy books incoming. Has there been anymore digging into the old books? Seems to me like any discussion about hidden meanings of…. Just about anything from Ryan has been suppressed. I fully trust in him but seems like he can’t really “speak” to apes anymore.
I’m xxxx holder and everything drs’d except some shares stuck from my brokeragelink account. That’s not changing. But direct communication from rc to us IS interesting to me. I’m sure by this point, we would see what clues he’s dropped from the first book set that have coincided with events. But all that digging is buried. There can’t be NO Reason for the book, or just made to collect money from apes. He’s calculated. Their is definitely a why. And also it doesn’t matter if some are interest or not. There is a reason tho, I’m sure.
@smallcutfart@Mojojojo1993
I'm xxx DRSed, must be frustrating for RC , presumably he is pushing for an investigation and it makes sense that he would adopt other means of communication so as to keep things clean for lawyers on his end. Or maybe it's all foil and he's just a straight shooter. Money to buy whiskey/actions speak louder kind of guy. Don't know, don't care, in for a penny, in for a pound.
But that's the tinfoil talking. Maybe there's a secret code. Be pretty risky though. Whole thing blows up but on a technicality that RC has been sending out secret codes in a separate company.
I don't buy it. I think he just wants books. Bit too much tinfoil going around
Read it all you like, you nutjob. It's just a children's book. Nobody's trying to SuPpReSs tHe TrUtH by telling you, it's just a children's book. You shouldn't expect secret messages... anywhere, really, but very obviously for example in a book about money aimed at the reading level of literal children.
What you're encouraging is the same as Qanon nonsense. "Guided apophenia." Making a hobby out of confusing one another. Anything - anything at all - can be twisted and theorycrafted and built up into a grand conspiracy. Counter-evidence just becomes proof of nefarious vindicative whatever. It's a bad-faith reading of reality, and the nature of bad faith is that there is no right answer. It's unfalsifiable. If you think that's the same as "not false," apparently you're in the right place.