A small moment in gaming history

This was when MS went sweeping in and started wide brushing over usernames as well. My friends' tags were Babyfetaljuice and Yourmomstampon and they were forced to change them to keep playing.

This one's funny.
https://www.gamesradar.com/microsoft-suspends-mans-account-because-he-lives-in-fort-gay-west-virginia/

And yet MS doesn't mind "The Ballad of Gay Tony" on the Xbox Live Marketplace... maybe it should ban Rockstar?

This shit still happens all the time. Somehow, all the morons got in charge of all the tech stuff. So now we have to deal with overly dramatic influencer wannabes, masquerading as social justice advocates. I was on reddit the other day, and the subject of teachers sleeping with students came up, and how no one takes it seriously when its a male student. I had said thats probably because just about every guy on the planet had wanted to sleep with at least one of his teachers when his in teenage years. I said that I had fancied my maths teacher when I was 15. I got banned for "soliciting sex from a minor"...

Cant even talk about our lived experience as human beings without someone looking to twist it into some kind of offence. What happened to Josh was a warning. And we didnt listen. Now we have religious puritains in the house of lords in the UK pushing age verification in online spaces. Everyone thinks about stealing data, its not. Its about pushing morality. They are currently going after the porn term "barely legal". Why? Because in their heads it means not legal... In the gaming space, it used to be "video games cause violence" that then pivoted to "video games cause sexual violence against women"...

Common sense is under constant attack these days.

We will enter the post-internet age in our lifetimes, mark my words. People are starting to realize that it is not sustainable to have corporations filter your every word and authoritarian governments hold killswitches at arm's reach. There is a growing need of a new and independent communication medium built from the ground up for censorship-resistance. And there is no shortage of bright minds to actually implement such a "peoples' network". Just look at freifunk, reticulum, etc.
Thirty years ago it was not possible to use a computer without installing proprietary software, but nowadays fully FOSS computing is the everyday reality of millions of people. Thirty years from now it will be possible to access all the world's knowledge and communicate securely with anyone willing to listen, all without paying a cent to greedy ISPs or having your traffic monitored by government agents. There will be crackdowns and repression, but we will make it through.
- Thirty years from now it will be possible to access all the world’s knowledge and communicate securely with anyone willing to listen, all without paying a cent to greedy ISPs or having your traffic monitored by government agents.
  That's very fucking optimistic.

Won't someone think of the fort gay children?!

Give them a break, they were searching in Bing.

TIL Bing was launched in 2009. That can't be right.
So the comment I'm replying to could be right on the money.
- Bing was just a rebrand, Live/MSN Search was a thing for a decade or so at that point.
Came here to make that exact joke. Have my upvote.

And the people responsible were fired, right? Right?
No?
Well there's your problem right there. That's how common sense ~~dies~~ unlives on the altar of corporate profits.

Why do you think that firing someone over this is the correct response? I'm sorry but that is a really stupid mindset.
You learn and train/educate your employees so that it doesn't happen again.
“Recently, I was asked if I was going to fire an employee who made a mistake that cost the company $600,000. No, I replied, I just spent $600,000 training him. Why would I want somebody to hire his experience?”
– Thomas John Watson Sr., IBM
- Why do you think that firing someone over this is the correct response?
  because someone who bans an account because it has the word "gay" in the name should not work in a position where they can ban accounts.
- somebody who repeatedly chooses to remain ignorant, not do their job, and not look into this is NOT somebody that can be trained. they will just revert to their ways soon after trying to address it and maybe showing improvement
  source: my anecdotal evidence of every single poor performer I have trained
- It's an offense that can't be easily fixed by teaching, seeing as how that employee could have looked at a map at any time and verified that the account holder wasn't lying. Unwillingness to access information likely cannot be fixed with forced exposure to the information they were unwilling to access.
- I appreciate the sentiment, I really do. And yes, the problem is more of a systemic one. But we need real people to personally feel the consequences of this idiocy if we want things to change for the better. Otherwise, everyone will just keep on pretending everything is fine.

I always find that shit like this could be very easily resolved by a single person going on ~~Google Maps~~ Bing maps and searching for the place.

There are many places with seemingly stupid names.

Check out place names in Newfoundland, Canada. We’ve got Dildo, Placentia, Conception Bay, and many more. We’ve also got Heart’s Desire, Heart’s Content, and Hearts Delight, not necessarily inappropriate names but I could see someone flagging it as a fake name nevertheless.
And there's the problem. It wasn't so much they refused to acknowledge the city existed. The company refused to acknowledge they had to provide support staff beyond seeing a ticket and closing the ticket.
This is a pretty textbook example of the Scunthorpe Problem.
- Oh I live not too far from Scunthorpe. Believe me, it's always been a problem 👍
Intercourse, PA ; checking in.
The customer support center was probably locked from accessing any website except a tightly controlled set of pages and tools. Even Maps is too easy to turn into a game. Look at Geoguesser.
I remember in high school we would use MS Paint and an eraser tool to make a game where you had to trace over a similar sized line and whoever had the most erased without backtracking won. Point being, people will make a game out of anything so ~~petty tyrants~~ managers have to lock that shit down to focus their people on the work.

Curious if they ever did that to anyone from Gaylord, MI or even just Gay, MI.

My Uncle Winky used to own a bar in Gay called the Gay Bar. It's still there, although under different management. I literally went there this morning because I'm on vacation in Keweenaw, they have some raunchy-ass merch.
- Raunchy ass-merch you say?

there's a common last name in some Sioux heritage... Killsenemy and a bunch of years ago a lot of American Indians with the last name were getting their accounts banned but the pale people with the same last name we not.

probably due to the n8v way of pointing out it's KillsEnemy

Like Scunthorpe

Lol
In 2008, Microsoft confirmed that its policy to prevent the use of words relating to sexual orientation had meant that Richard Gaywood's name was deemed offensive and could not be used in his "gamertag" or in the "Real Name" field of his bio.[42]
How does this exact issue happen twice
Are you not allowed to be gay on Xbox?
- Dick Gaywood is probably the funniest name in history. I hope he's a supply teacher.

Fort Gay erasure.

Strange how they haven't been forced by Turnip to change their name yet.

Gaymer

I know someone with this vanity plate!