BreadPanes 58: "Corporatism, Not Capitalism"
BreadPanes 58: "Corporatism, Not Capitalism"
BreadPanes 58: "Corporatism, Not Capitalism"
Literally this guy i knows EXACT argument every time we discuss this. Then I describe how capitalism inevitably becomes corporatism because of HOW IT WORKS.
And communism becomes Stalinism.. that's a bad faith argument, comrade
"Stalinism" largely refers to specific economic choices by Stalin during his time as general secretary, it isn't a mode of production. Capitalism, on the other hand, naturally builds up monopolies that use the state in their own interests. The state isn't distinct from the ruling class in society, it's an extension, so as fierce competition gives way to monopolist syndicates, tech giants, and imperialism, this is a natural trajectory.
It's disingenious to say that USSR achieved communism in 5 years between it's inception and Stalin taking over. Especially since no one at the time have claimed achieving even socialism. Stalin took over country that attempted to build socialist society and struggled economically, and then led it in very different direction.
Early USSR was ruled by communists, sure, but that's far from it being communist country, and even further from the country achieving communism.
Gotta love how basic logic is far beyond the comprehension of ancaps.
Tell me, who is going to enforce property rights in an anarchist setting? Whoever has the biggest guns?
\
So, you're telling me that a person or group will use force and threaten violence against those that don't play along? How is that anarchic?
Yes. The ancap i know loves guns.
Still doesnt rise up against tyranny though but theyd love to take down a home invader. Thats all these idiots dream about.
They fail at anarchy because capitalism is hierarchical, not because every social order is enforced by people with guns.
Violence is forbidden 😭😭😭
All the free market players will pay to eliminate the violence 😭😭
Well that's just what we have already
This is dumb as snake would never even recognize people dying by anything but their own hand. Snake still an idiot
say what you want but i think it's pretty cool that they made a "victims of communism" museum. it's a building where you walk through a main door to get in and learn about people who were victimized by at least ostensibly communist regimes. it's great because the main door works both ways: if you're already inside, you can walk through the same door and step into the "victims of capitalism" museum.
Honestly, I'd be tempted to grant the premise. Let's work together to end corporations. See what happens. When every commercial entity is an employee-owned small business worth less than $5M, communism vs. socialism vs. capitalism becomes a very interesting discussion.
Having every company be petite bourgeois cooperatives doesn't really get rid of the major problems with capitalism, plus there's no actual way to get from here to there where socialism doesn't make more sense. Communism is a post-socialist society, so it isn't really something you do from the outset.
Communists do not want a myriad of petit bourgeois small business.
Employee ownership is literally socialism my friend.
The defining characteristic of capitalism is that anyone with money (capital) can own the means of making more money. If you remove that, it is no longer capitalism. Period. It would be something else.
In this case, with universal worker ownership of the means of production, it would be socialism.
Never in my life have i understood why the working class (me and every single person i know) DONT want workers to own the means of production. You DO THE WORK you should OWN IT. Its simple.
This isn't really accurate. Petite Bourgeois worker-owners in competing firms still exist within the framework of capitalism. Socialist ownership would be more collectivized than focused on cooperatives, though cooperatives can play a role in the developing stages of socialism (like they do in socialist states today).
I know that, and you know that, but people are a whole lot more likely to vote for it with that framing than if the "s-word" gets anywhere near it.
Source/explanation for why capitalism kills 100 million people every 5 years please?
Here's a list of US atrocities, just a few of those equals that tally.
Also there's this report from results on child poverty, which estimates about 10 million preventable child deaths per year, which means capitalism kills 100M every decade.
Also the PRC has lifted more than 800M people out of poverty in the last few decades, more than the entire population of latin america. If you remove the PRC from poverty indexes, than world poverty is actually increasing.
ok this is probably gonna get censored because this is lemmy.ml after all, but less than 1 million people had been violently killed by the US worldwide since the end of the cold war, both directly and indirectly.
you can't really blame starving children in africa on american capitalism, because if they were to interfere, there'd be claims of it being interference in another country's internal affairs and "neocolonialism" or sth like that
China has done good, alright, i give you that. :)
What a meaningless comparison
…There’s this interesting minor character in a TV show called Pantheon. Spoilers, but basically the protagonists are fresh off opposing “Steve Jobs but extra fascist.” They meet these Chinese intelligence agents in VR going after this superintelligence holy grail like everyone is. They come off as patriotic and almost deliberately stereotypical.
Anyway, later, these intelligence agents end up temporarily stuck with “Indian Hyper-Capitalist Hitler” in VR (it’s complicated, okay?), and one of them sits down to play a board game:
https://pantheon-amc.fandom.com/wiki/Han_Ping
I’ll just transcribe what Han Ping, who it turns out, is an mind-uploaded old man, said:
‘’’ I was never one for board games myself… Too much to do, my work, my studies. But I came to see their value after I was sent to prison. Laughs a little. In captivity, one must keep one’s mind active, but not too active.
(Speaking of his intelligence friend nursing the wounded). The party never sent her to prison, so, she never had to learn that lesson.
One game. Indulge me?
…
(Indian Capitalist Hitler): You were a political prisoner? Hm? A democracy activist then? Challenged the Party’s authority?
(Han Ping, after laughing amusedly): This is what everyone outside of China thinks. The only reason to oppose the PRC with something as decadent as western democracy… I spoke out against the Party precisely because they have strayed from the path of democratic centralism. They have become capitalists, no better than the West.
(Hitler): Why, then, would you serve the Party by being uploaded?
(Ha Ping): I do not serve the Party. I serve China. Uploaded Intelligence has the potential to become this century’s greatest leap forward, a revolutionary innovation of which neither Marx nor Mao could have dreamed. All obstacles for the proletariat victory, the riddle of scarcity, dilemmas or distribution and disparity, these are all finally resolved when we remove the material imperative. The dialectical struggle of history has always, essentially, been a question of how to apply justice to matter. Take away matter, and what remains, is justice… Your move.
‘’’
That stuck with me.
The whole show is largely about governments and their corrupted ideals falling apart when challenged with really disruptive tech, along with those of the characters it followed.
Here on Lemmy, when I poke around communities, I kind of hope to see that ‘purist’ and anti government sentiment. But when push comes to shove, it seems like folks always fall back to party lines instead, not necessarily the PRC’s but wherever they’re from.
So yeah, when I see this meme, I just see two people about to yell at each other over whatever atrocities the other is in denial over. There’s no growth of self awareness, just hostility. “The Don’t tread on me” ignorant jerk meme may be too true, but it could easily be extended a few panels to portray red shirt guy as a jerk too.
The world's largest economy by PPP is run by Marxists, and there are other socialist countries around the world. Communism is far from dead.
The problem isn't an ism. These arguments are so tiring. Greed is a problem endemic to our species. It's much larger than an economic system can solve. Although... communism is a power structure and capitalism is a monetary system. People conflating the two are always doing so out of ignorance or bad faith.
there is a cure for political illiteracy.
STOP YOUR WRONGTHINK NOW!
You are making things too complicated. We just need a different ism bro. Just one more isn bro I promise.
Things are so simple and you are ruining the vibes with your critical thinking.
You think greed is a problem and we need to address social problems before we can fix things? Sounds like some liberal nonsense.
Read Einstein bro, he knows everything because he's basically like Rick from Rick and Morty but real and the best author of communism there is.
If you don't just meme the meme then you are capitalism you dipshit dumfuck.
/s
Just a TLDR of the replies you are going to get here (but far less GIFs).
Political ideologies don't kill people. Individuals kill people.
Capitalism happens to reward this kind of behaviour but it doesn't "cause" it.
Edit: ML users don't seem to have a concept of nuanced political discussion. Should we just forgive these crimes against humanity on the individual level and blame an ideology instead? Is it true that communism inherently involves the death of millions of people? Or were those bad actors doing bad things because they are bad people?
Edit 2: Capitalism is a symptom not the cause. Until we address what led us to capitalism we will never see a better world.
Individuals don’t exist in a vacuum though. Ideologies and systems shape behavior by setting the rules of the game and defining what gets rewarded or punished. Under capitalism, exploitation, profit-over-people, and competition are incentivized, so it does cause patterns of harm — not just isolated bad actors. That’s why we see consistent violence, poverty, and dispossession under capitalism across the globe. It’s not random individuals — it’s a system rewarding destructive behavior.
You are just restating what I said.
My criticism is that blaming "capitalism" for the actions taken by individuals or collective actions taken by the group moves the blame away from the individuals committing those actions. Which is not helpful.
People do bad stuff because they are bad. I live in a capitalist county but choose not to bad things to people because I'm not a bad person.
FWIW I am anarchist so INB4 "supporting capitalism".
Also, that's not what downvotes are for but whatever.
Until we address what led us to capitalism we will never see a better world.
Time? Reality? Science? Humans? Feudalism? Like wtf are you going to address?
They both kill people, the first causes the second to happen and justify itself because of it.
Personally, looking at the state of western societies, I’m all up for both: personal re-education (yes, if you don’t show empathy towards others you’re going to prison) but before that, systemic change. If you don’t change society first, there is no place for “bad” people to be reintegrated in without falling for the same influences. A sick society produces (mostly) sick people.
I think I agree. It doesn't seem like we can have any nuanced discussion amongst the hive mind meme lords here though.
I don't support capitalism in any way shape or form. It only can lead to the situation were in now.
But it seems we are expected to believe in communism as some kind of holy untouchable grail that will solve all of societies woes. It's heresy to be critical of anyone who dangles the communism carrot in front of us. We must blindly consume the promises of charlatans.
Anyone one who thinks critically is a "dumbass" "liberal" who hasn't... checks notes read Einstein.
Should we just forgive these crimes against humanity on the individual level and blame an ideology instead?
We can do both, though. Hold individuals accountable, and still recognize how they're enabled and emboldened by the systems they operate in. Focusing on either the individual or the system while disregarding the other when trying to assign blame or find a better solution is not going to help
Reminder that the 100 million number comes from the editor's introduction to the Black Book of Communism, who "was 'hunting' for the highest possible number of victims", and whose introduction was disavowed by three of the other authors.
Also, a side note: The term they're looking for is "corporatocracy" or "corporate capitalism", or sometimes you'll hear "crony capitalism" (as if these are distortions of capitalism and not inherent trends!). Corporatism is a whole other thing, a class-collaborationist ideology/system based on collective bargaining of groups. It has its own issues, but it's a separate concept.
But the word "corporatism" is so misused that it's hardly worth calling wrong anymore...