Minnesota is in the process of proposing a new state flag. Here are some proposals, circulating online. Many feature the North Star, a symbol of the state.
The current flag looks like this, which obviously needs changing:
Ha! Sadly CGP grey loves his teslas and cars. His video about how self driving cars are the future shows a dystopian idea where pedestrians or cyclists have no space on the roads at all. (And he doesn’t even consider trains or other public transit)
#4 is my choice. Very clean, it's an easily recognizable design, and it seems more creative than just "Nordic cross with star" or whatever the abominations in the later half are.
The pattern is called Selburose and is a traditional pattern used in knitted mittens and sweaters from the area of Selbu located in Norway at the border to Sweden.
I actually like the 8th one -- the one with three vertical stripes. The one above that, though, looks like a loon and baby loon are following the Star of Bethlehem, on their way to deliver a nice bowl of cream of wild rice soup to the baby Jesus.
Personally not a fan of Iceland-with-star, as most Scandihoovians here are of Swedish or Norwegian ancestry (in that order if I remember right, but don't quote me), not Icelandic. I like the dichromatic Nordic cross better, but I prefer #1, with the non-wavy centered stars close behind. If I had to pick, I think I like center-star-with-green more than center-star-with-snowflake even though the former has too many colors---green = forest = Minnesota.
I legitimately thought the cross above was red lol. Looking at it now it's clearly green; my guess is my phone's blue light filter last night and my colorblindness were factors.
Oh look at the royal snob over here with his "why don't they use purple" nonsense, like it doesn't cost a year worth of grain and my eldest daughter's hand in marriage.
Why does it obviously need changing? The new design will be talked about for like aonth...people will love it and hate it, then no one will care again.
Every state whose flag is just the state seal over a blue or white background should be forced to change their flag. The concept is offensively boring.
The whole point of a Minnesota flag is to have an easy way to display you're Minnesotan. Literally half of the state flags look the exact same as ours if there isn't a wind blowing, and genuinely that number doesn't go down much even WITH a breeze.
If we have something more iconic, noticeable at a glance, it's marketable. Think about Britain's flag on all their tourist merch. Think about the MOA star on everything to do with the mall, think "I <3 NYU" mugs, shirts, hats.
Visual aesthetics aside, in the Seal of Minnesota (the busy bit in the center, which has official uses besides the flag), the native on horseback is riding off into the sunset (westward, the 1983 edit notwithstanding) in the most gerenous interpretation or being driven off by the settler in a less charitable one (see rifle in the foreground). Regardless, the message is one of displacement of the native peoples by the mostly European-heritage settlers for the sake of "civilization". It's not something we should display proudly as an embodiment of our state's core values, and for that reason has been contentious for years.
Some reading if anyone is more interested in the history: #1 and #2
Current flag is nice. Maybe take the spear out of the guy's hand, but otherwise why not include images of the native population. Unless those dates have something to do with killing loads of indigenous Americans, in which case...maybe take them off as well.