Im trying out some simple KDE customization on Garuda, what you think?
Im trying out some simple KDE customization on Garuda, what you think?
I think that i've yet to see worse design as Garuda, it's like tribal tatoos but for gamer
19Yeah, and garuda seems like a pretty shit distro IMO.
1
I'm pretty noviceand will certainly offend someone with this statement but I thought KDE was Windows-like (task bar, start menu, etc) and Gnome was Mac-like (permanent menu bar across top, dock).
The screen shot seems to remind me of Gnome rather than KDE. What are the benefits of configuring KDE to look like Gnome?
8Well understandable , since thats the default look. But KDE is one of the most customizable DE, you could make it look like anything you want.
19Yeah, and Garuda's default KDE config is very mac like.
3I run Gnome (Ubuntu currently) and have minor stability issues. I also just... kinda don't like it. Previously I was running Fedora and liked it more but again, stability issues (which was what I was hoping to solve moving to Ubuntu).
Do you have any suggestions for a novice friendly distro that has (or can easily be set up to have) a dock and hot corner window switching like gnome under KDE?
1
Kde defaults to a windows style layout, but it's very configurable by design. You can freely add and customize panels with different widgets. Kde has different design philosophies than Gnome. Even with a similar dock + menu bar layout, features vary or are handled differently.
11I run Gnome (Ubuntu currently) and have minor stability issues. I also just… kinda don’t like Ubuntu. Previously I was running Fedora and liked it more but again, stability issues (which was what I was hoping to solve moving to Ubuntu).
Do you have any suggestions for a novice friendly distro that has (or can easily be set up to have) a dock (that can be hidden) and hot corner window switching like gnome under KDE?
2
KDE is for those who love customization. You can create an alien like Desktop that isn't Mac nor Windows similar. Its more about being able to change everything or most things.
Gnome should be more stable... because you can't change it into a buggy custom setup (except you use Extensions)
6I'd say a benefit is that one can achieve the workflow of GNOME or macOS while having the configurability of KDE at one's disposal.
4I think the people who likes the macos aesthetic are using KDE more than GNOME.
3Not sure what to think of that large space use across the bottom on a widescreen display.
That's one reason why I downgraded from windows 11 to windows 10.
In standard KDE, the standard "start menu" at least is quite thin.
2I run Gnome with Ubuntu, and hide the dock (tried to set it up more like Fedora, which I liked more).
2
Love it! It’s like macOS, Windows 7 and the edgy GAMER™️ aesthetic had a kid.
5Thank you.
2
Looks really cool. Also it's the first time I see this distro.
4I'm using it as well. For me it was a great entry point to Linux. I wanted to start with Arch or a Arch distro right out of the box and Garuda works like a charm for setting up and maintaining everything. I will try setting up Arch by myself for the next time, but for now it's perfect for me.
3