9 mo. ago • 98%

Meta cuts off third-party access to Facebook Groups, leaving developers and customers in disarray

techcrunch.com Meta cuts off third-party access to Facebook Groups, leaving developers and customers in disarray | TechCrunch

The recent surprise announcement that Meta will soon be shutting down its Facebook Groups API is throwing some businesses and social media marketers into

Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁) @feddit.it Meta interrompe l'accesso di terze parti ai gruppi Facebook, lasciando sviluppatori e clienti nello sconforto

Hacker News @lemmy.smeargle.fans Meta cuts off third-party access to Facebook Groups

20 comments

What’s more, developers tell us that Meta’s motivation behind the API’s shutdown is unclear. On the one hand, it could be that Facebook Groups don’t generate ad revenue and the shutdown of the API will leave developers without a workaround. But Meta hasn’t clarified if that’s the case.

No, that's definitely it, you got it.

The promises of web 2.0 simply can't survive in the capital-poisioned wasteland the Internet has become.

113
- I remember saying back in the early and mid-2000s that the world would be completely fucked if Big Corp ever figured out the Internet (remember all those cringe commercials and campaigns back then where they tried to meme/go viral/etc?). Turns out, it was true.
  
  36
  
  That's with every media. Printing started to share scientific knowledge and ended with advertising flyers. Phones started with contacting relatives and ended with telemarketing. TV ended in reality TV between the ads.
  
  16
if you get fucked because you’re still on a Meta platform, why should I feel bad for you?

after all these years, you’ve all had plenty of warning. you should very well know better by now. whatever bad happens is totally on you.

42
- This is mostly an issue for businesses that were using groups, not individuals.
  
  But beyond that, Facebook is particularly difficult to separate from depending on what you use it for. If you don't care about anyone else on it, sure, you can leave the platform. But if you need to communicate with certain people and they won't leave it, especially regional groups, you're stuck.
  
  30
  
  Nothing I hate more than a company's website being a Facebook page
  
  47
  
  My neighbourhood facebook group is pretty useful. I have discover a running group on facebook to run with people, it's cool and improve my mwntal health. All critisizm about facebook is valid but as long as it's useful to me, i'll stay on it.
  
  6
- It's used as a source of income for a lot of people. It's easy to group everyone and say they deserve all that happens but take a minute and consider those who are struggling and it's their only way to find work and others are just trying to stay afloat in the sinking economy
  
  4
- This is how I see it: Facebook is essentially a government. (Replace Facebook with any other social media platform that's too big to compete with). It's where the people are, and like it or not, you have to be on Facebook to reach the masses.
  
  I've never used Facebook in any real capacity, and at times it was to my detriment. At University, Facebook groups were (are?) how students communicate with each other, share information and knowledge, ask for help, etc. By not being on Facebook I missed out on all of that stuff. It's futile to try to get everyone else to move elsewhere - it just ain't happening.
  
  So Facebook is a de-facto government: people HAVE to be on Facebook, and the company has the exclusive ability to police the platform and control how it can be used - e.g. through APIs and the website interface. Everyone else is at the whims of that.
  
  But as a government, Facebook is obviously not a democracy. It's a dictatorship. Maybe an oligarchy. Look I know very little about political systems, but we can all probably agree that it's as far from a democracy as can be.
  
  It is my opinion that governments need to wise up to this. Tech platforms that become nearly as powerful as governments are a direct threat to democracy when they don't have any of the checks and balances that democracies have. Not to mention when the governments themselves begin to rely on these platforms to publish announcements and stuff. The EU's Digital Markets Act is a big step in the right direction. I hope it's just the start.
  
  1
Meta's getting jealous of falling behind the competition on enshittification.

35
I would love to use FB Marketplace, but not enough to have a FB account.

28
- You're not missing anything. It's rife with scammers.
  
  13
  
  And while CL also has scammers, I find it a more pleasant experience than FB marketplace.
  
  4
- Could not agree more.
  
  Fuck Zuckerberg.
  
  5
This is the best summary I could come up with:

The recent surprise announcement that Meta will soon be shutting down its Facebook Groups API is throwing some businesses and social media marketers into disarray.

Meta explained that a major use case for the API was a feature that allowed developers to privately reply in Facebook Groups.

But developers told TechCrunch that the shutdown of the API would cause problems for companies that offer solutions to customers who want to schedule and automate their social media posts.

For example, explained Adam Peterson, the CEO of VipeCloud, which provides a suite of tools for scheduling social media posts, the API’s closure will have a “noticeable impact” on his business, as about 8% of his total revenue is on the chopping block.

On the one hand, it could be that Facebook Groups don’t generate ad revenue and the shutdown of the API will leave developers without a workaround.

“The removal of third-party access to Facebook Groups could significantly alter the digital landscape, creating both hurdles and opportunities for community managers and businesses alike.

The original article contains 1,008 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

5

You've viewed 20 comments.