Put your calculators away boys. Looks like the store discovered how math works.
60ReplyWhere is the midly infuriating part?
27ReplyPresenting the pricing as if it represents a bulk discount when it doesn't.
The only reason to do this is to trick people who can't do multiplication into buying more.
81ReplyIt probably once did, but they relabeled it.
19ReplyYou can clearly see there is a sticker over the original price. It originally probably was a bulk deal that the store reduced to an all around deal.
You're over here bitching about people who can't do math and you can't even see.
0ReplyI'd argue it's a nice thing to make the costs obvious for people who can't do multiplication.
0Reply
Why is this downvoted. I had the same question and I was genuinely confused. Are we not allowed to ask questions :x
12ReplyHow to pay 8 £^2
3ReplyMove to the planet No Bloke's Land
1Reply
Math
1Reply
Well 2 is between 1 and 6, 3 is between 2 and 4. So for 4 I’d say anywhere from 35 to 39 dollars. Which is, itself, a spread of 4 so you know it’s right.
18ReplyI can't express the embarrassment I feel from how long it took me to understand this.
4ReplyNot sure I still do
4ReplyMath can be tricky
1Reply
Yeah but how much for 4?
Wish I could tell you, buddy
18ReplyOk.... But is ££8 more expensive than £8?
11ReplyThats 8 square-pounds.
7ReplyI got a square pound in my pants and I'm not even European.
3Reply
4 for £33
8ReplyHow much for 5?
2ReplyWe haven't yet discovered the mathematics needed to answer that question
5Reply
£ - 8£
7Reply£ £8
11Reply
It was pointed out that the first price was higher originally. The funny thing is that in that case the price of four would be nice to know. With the given information it would be economically more efficient to buy two times two if you wanted four vs one times three and then an additional one.
6Reply£3... something?
5ReplyNext Generation ™️ apparel teaches math 😄
3Reply