Element app updating backwards on Debian 12 KDE?
Element app updating backwards on Debian 12 KDE?
This might be a real stupid question but why is discover updating to a lower version? Is there any place I can read up why this is the case?
P.S.: Yes, I could have absolutely google this but lemmy is about more than just shitposts and memes imo. Asking some rather noobish questions will make us appear on google btw.
Sounds like https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465864
52Aaaand solved! Thanks for this precise reply! Pretty sure its exactly that.
21
It is called "downgrading", and it is not uncommon to have some packages downgrading when updating/upgrading a system, due to several reasons.
17No. This is just a thing Discover does. Unless nearly every update I've done for every Flatpak I have installed on my Steam Deck have actually been downgrades.
16As someone else pointed out, its a bug and mentioned on the kde bugtracker.
12No, it's just a (long fixed!) bug. In the case of the Deck, the next version of SteamOS comes with the fix soon... in the case of Debian, they don't ship our bugfix releases, so it'll be stuck with this until Debian 13 :/
2
Under what circumstances? I don't think I've ever seen a package downgraded during an upgrade.
3I somehow missed this to be a flatpak via Discover. Granted this may not be usual in distros with a traditional update model, downgrading packages may be present in rolling distros, or distros with overlapping minor versions, or having 3rd party repos providing conflicting packages to those of the distro.
I offer my system as example:
The following product is going to be upgraded: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20240211-0 -> 20240313-0 The following 14 packages are going to be downgraded: ghc-binary ghc-containers ghc-deepseq ghc-directory ghc-exceptions ghc-mtl ghc-parsec ghc-pretty ghc-process ghc-stm ghc-template-haskell ghc-text ghc-time ghc-transformers1
Pretty sure this is a bug in either discover or flatpak. My guess is flatpak has the 2 versions it feeds discover swapped, so the versions appear swapped, but in reality it will be fine
13Okay! Thanks for the reply. :)
3
edit: turns out I'm wrong. google does index lemmy pages. it's just not easy to find them through google
I dont think its possible to find any lemmy posts through Google7Honestly a shame. R*ddit is full of helpful information, as is Lemmy, but the latter is not indexed.
8I just tried searching "element lemmy" and got the article Lemmy: Fans call for periodic table element to be named after Motörhead frontman
Whereas "element reddit" gives /r/elementchat/
Lemmy is indexed on Google as using the
site:operator will show, e.g. "rust site:programming.dev" gives sensible results, but there's not a way to search across Lemmy. Well, not with Google anyway (Kagi has a Fediverse lens that works fairly well).10
Nah, we already are on google but it depends on a lot of factors. A lemmy frontend is just another webpage so google will crawl it if you allow it. So if an instance disallows it specifically or has incorrect/unfamiliar sitemap it might not work.
5hmm, maybe that's the case for lemmy.world. I wasn't able to find anything from my comment or post history, even though I copied it exactly into the search.
edit: just had the idea to put quotation marks around the thing I copied to search for that exact string, and now I found it. Yeah, it really just seems like lemmy pages are not very popular results so google pushes them all the way to the bottom.
3