‘Massacre’: Israel forces attack crowds waiting for aid in Gaza, killing 21
‘Massacre’: Israel forces attack crowds waiting for aid in Gaza, killing 21
Palestinian officials call latest assault ‘premeditated’ as people seeking humanitarian supplies increasingly targeted.
“They were all Hamas”
63To tell the truth I backed over the last two in my car. Luckily they turned out to be Hamas.
21Hamas is the new slaughtering process that certifies it to be safe for Israel.
7
So was it Israeli helicopters, tanks and drones? Or armed Palestinian gunmen and trucks? Evidence recorded in the aftermath should make one or the other clear.
To kill 21 people and injure over a hundred, it's much easier to do that with the former than the latter.
32Fuck Israel.
8Is this sister than the last one?
1Having not read the story or care to: sometimes a peaceful crowd will go mad. hence there is a phrase "the madness of crowds"
-31Having not read this comment nor caring to do so: Sometimes people post the first thought that comes to their mind even if it only barely relates to the topic.
16or, they know more about it than an article can say.
1
No one gains anything from your comment if it's not informed by the discussion the rest of us are having. Consider just keeping it to yourself next time.
4someone already told me to die, so that's what I'll do. (everyone will eventually)
1
What do you believe is the rational response to a crowd getting restless?
4sometimes. Hence that was the word used.
1a new gooey adhesive foam that immobilizes people but allows them to breath?
1
brother cope harder
2what am I coping with. all I said was ...sometimes a peaceful crowd will go mad. hence there is a phrase "the madness of crowds"
1
I've been reading many different news sources lately and I don't trust them. I'm not saying that this isn't true, but wait for secondary sources, Al Jazeera sucks IMO,
Media Bias gives them a left of center, which I've found not to be true, but also this quote:
In general, straight news reporting has a minimal bias; however, as a state-funded news agency, Al Jazeera is typically not critical of Qatar.
-35Lol. Imagine saying Al Jazeera "sucks" and then citing fucking mediabiasfactcheck
Any hexbear users have the family guy race chart emoji on hand?
25I should write a bot for MBFC mentions to save myself time https://lemmy.ml/comment/8913172
16Give me an example of something they lied about in this conflict.
14That hospital bombing which turned out to be a misfired Palestinian rocket?
But in all fairness, even the Israelis had to go and check it wasn't them that did it.
-5
Mediabias is heavily biased
7All press is biased. See the press as lawyers. Western press=lawyers of Israel. Arabic press =lawyers of Palestinians.
You as a judge has to read the contradicting sides and decide for yourself what is the reality.
7You are correct, every source of media has a bias. To expand upon your comment. Whenever we are consuming media and in particular news that sould always be in our minds. Who's is sponsoring this, what is trying to be accomplished by this piece?
Al Jazeera has a stronger bias than most but considering that it's essentially state media they are a lot more objective than I expect they would be. It's not a trash news source but it definitely takes more scrutiny than say DW news.
-7
AJ is biased heavily on this one, more than they are on most topics. They're practically the state media of Qatar, and Qatar shelters Hamas leaders.
But it's hard to find any source in a conflict like this that isn't biased somewhere to someone. This war is chaos and chaos always has a lot of wiggle room when it comes to truth. Read BBC News and Al Jazeera and take the average. It's somewhere around there.
Israel are cunts. Hamas are cunts. Lots of innocent people getting killed. Whether 10 or 50 people got killed in any particular massacre is immaterial at this point.
-3Putting both in the same category is strange as one is an armed resistance and the other is an occupation force.
5
It starting to appear it was Hamas that opened fire on Palestinians waiting for aid.
https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-792075#google_vignette
-42I’d take anything published by Jerusalem Post as inherently incapable of being unbiased about Israel/Palestine. Let’s wait for a third party confirmation before making this claim.
40Yeah just like how it was Hamas driving the trucks running people over
Starting to wonder if it's genocidal laziness or a new standard of mental gymnastics every time the IDF opens their mouth
24Israel got in hot water internationally the last time for doing exactly the same thing. So blaming Hamas is an easy trick to pull to try and detract from the ongoing mass starvation they are directly responsible for.
It's really gross.
They did the exact same thing when they first blew up a hospital. Then they proceeded to blow up all the hospitals after the major news outlets stopped covering it.
Ditto with murdering literally over 100 journalists to try and suppress independent coverage of their ongoing genocide.
You can't trust fascists propaganda to accurately report fascist genocide.
14
Please don't use a zionist newspaper as proof. They are unreliable
16Check their post history, lmao. They're referencing a Zionist newspaper because they're a zionist.
16