Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)IS
帖子
5
评论
869
加入于
2 yr. ago

  • By this definition, performing a genocide is art.

    Edit: I have been informed by replies, thank you.

    By this definition, performing a genocide can be art.

    Also, this post was art because I pissed off a bunch of people to the point that they were compelled to respond.

  • Captured, then released. From the article:

    Otherwise, she seemed to be in good condition and, as I released her, she sauntered away into the darkness, seemingly unfazed by her close encounter with me.

  • You really should be providing a source when you make these kinds of claims:

    Joel Myers' Wikipedia article is pretty damning. He does sound like an asshole.

    Myers faced criticism in 2005 when he supported the National Weather Service Duties Act of 2005, a bill ... that would have prohibited the National Weather Service from publishing weather data to the public when private-sector entities, such as AccuWeather, perform the same function commercially.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Myers#Political_activities

  • Every time

    跳过
  • Not according to latest studies, there is no safe level of processed meat consumption.

    Cold cuts are often processed, rather than delivered raw.

    Secondary News Article: https://www.sciencealert.com/massive-review-finds-no-safe-level-of-processed-meat-consumption

    Original Study: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-03775-8

    consuming processed meat (at 0.6–57 g d−1) was associated with at least an 11% average increase in type 2 diabetes risk and a 7% (at 0.78–55 g d−1) increase in colorectal cancer risk.

    So eating a gram of processed meat per day would significantly increase chances of type 2 diabetes, and colorectal cancer.

    1 gram ≃ 0.03 ounces (British imperial units)

  • Link to study: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.06576

    Conversely, they welcomed automation that would free up time for higher-value work (69.4%), reduce task repetitiveness (46.6%), and improve the quality of their work (46.6%). Specifically, they welcomed automation that might include scheduling client appointments, maintaining files of information, or rectifying errors in records.

    The study also explored preferences regarding the level of AI involvement. Most respondents favored a collaborative approach, with 45.2% desiring an equal partnership between workers and AI and 35.6% seeking human oversight at critical junctures. This indicates a clear resistance to fully automated systems, the scholars noted.

  • This is the same logic as "The big red sticker says I'm saving money if I buy this thing."

    Want to actually save money? Don't spend it at all.

    Also, if you think Prime day somehow hurts their bottom line, you're misinformed.

  • Uplifting News @lemmy.world

    The dog, the game of fetch and a tragedy averted | RNZ

    IWTL I Want To Learn @lemmy.world

    IWTL how to Build an RF Amplifier

    Books @lemmy.world

    Recommendation Request: Similar to Iron War

    Bioinformatics @programming.dev

    Bioinformatics for Beginners

    Bioinformatics @programming.dev

    Rosalind: Website for learning bioinformatics and programming through problem solving