Accuracy at longer ranges is essentially just small caliber high velocity cope to make up for increased deflection that small grain loads suffer from. It's better to have a bigger bullet because combat ranges aren't far enough to make a difference anyways, this is why you see Grendel and .300blk trends, which are essentially just 7.62x39 with extra steps.

That depends on the barrel length, however, all combat happens inside 400yrds so the difference is marginal at best.

Doesn't even need to be a marxist take, regular history is enough

For everybody else, just aim for the legs

223 is more accurate than 7.62x39

*At longer distances, not inherently more accurate

Thanks, it feels nice too

Sorry for posting this 3 times, I can't see the post on my profile page so I didn't know it worked until I got replies

Yeah that's how wars work, the enemy gets attacked

The autopilot on that F-35 in South Carolina worked perfectly though

Actually the Russians are using very large rubber bands from the acme corporation strung between trees and the Ukrainians are bouncing off of them.

Thanks. Just need a dummy rifle grenade now

It's comrade admin's choice, although it would be nice to do both, direct people here and keep it open, active

Thanks, looks like it worked!

Let them fight