Kalcifer @ Kalcifer @sh.itjust.works

All of this user's content is licensed under [CC BY 4.0](https://creativeco

---

Read more

Posts

161

Comments

1,689

Joined

2 yr. ago

Nope! I do it all manually; though, it can definitely be tedious at times. It has crossed my mind to write a script to automatically generate at least some of them (or even just some of their components), but I just haven't gotten around to it yet.

Also, as a side note, the citation style is my own that I've been "developing". I'm sort developing it as I use it.

[…] send $10 to the band.

What method would you recommend for one to do this in general?

I'm not sure if this exactly fits what you're looking for, but the following 5 albums by The Dear Hunter are connected through a shared storyline ^[1]:

1. Act I: The Lake South, The River North ^[2]
2. Act II: The Meaning of, and All Things Regarding Ms. Leading ^[3]
3. Act III: Life and Death ^[4]
4. Act IV: Rebirth in Reprise ^[5]
5. Act V: Hymns with the Devil in Confessional ^[6]

In light of certain recent government regulations redefining "child" to mean anyone under the age of 18 […]

Do you mind citing a source for that?

Is this post intended to be a sort of outcry around the idea that there's a risk of malware being in the AUR?

Is this post intended to be a sort of outcry around the idea that there's a risk of malware being in the AUR?

I'm just curious if said consumption goal is based on any scientific rationale, and, if so, what that rationale is.

Me, but with em dashes and parenthesis.

Lemmy ^[1]

Hm, while a witness's testimony may be evidence, iiuc, it would only be one piece of evidence. I think what's important is whether the evidence in question can be considered sufficient.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER! /j

Lemmy is mostly men […]

Has there been a recent survey?

[…] We should not believe absolutely anyone, regardless of gender, making any accusation. […]

Do you make a distinction between "accusation" and "testimony"?

[…] We trust [people] based on credibility and evidence. […]

I don't think this is necessarily the case. For example, one could choose to give someone a chance despite their past wrongs.

[…] someone who has been declared a rapist by a court of law and has been convicted of many serious crimes should never be president of a country […]

IMO, I don't think this is a good idea. My concern is that it may give one's opposition an incentive to find a way to falsely convict them of a crime (or maybe create a new criminal offense) in order to remove them from the running for office.

The burden of proof for a criminal rape suit is really high […]

How do you mean?

Which link?

[…] Classical centrist arguments […]

How are you defining centrism?

[…] Its always do you have a source, can you explain, etc, never adding to the discussion. […]

Do you not think adding sources and context is adding to the discussion?

Get the fuck out of here centrist

What exactly did you not like about my comment?