Kalcifer @ Kalcifer @sh.itjust.works

All of this user's content is licensed under [CC BY 4.0](https://creativeco

---

查看更多

帖子

161

评论

1,697

加入于

2 yr. ago

They also can’t send direct messages to users on that instance.

Can a user on the banning instance message the banned user? If so, can the banned user reply?

Does an instance ban block future posts by that user from being federated in?

Hrm, I have a suspicion that it was a false positive by the automod (maybe it didn't like "kill this idea"?):

Update (2025-07-22T02:37Z): The moderation action was a false positive, and has been reverted ^[2].

You can set up Cloudflare as your CDN and turn on CSAM detection. It will automatically block links to known CSAM from the managed global CSAM hash lists. […]

TIL!

So the user is banned from the instance where that label is seen (eg my instance)? Does an instance banning a user not block that user and their content from that instance? If not, what's the point of the ban?

[…] I’m hoping that by leaving out the @ sign before the local username, that won’t send him an unwanted notification […]

Personally, I think it's okay to ping him. I would think it'd be neat to see where and what conversations are occurring.

[…] Or more horrifically, this.

I'm not sure that's a "benefit"…

Banning bad actors ip’s. […]

Wouldn't that only be relevant for an admin/moderator? Why does it need to be publicly viewable?

How so? Wouldn't that only be relevant for the admin/moderator? I'm specifically wondering why it's publicly viewable.

I'm not sure that I understand/follow your point. Could you rephrase it?

[…] honestly if you’ve got a giant family and you’re basically a half a busload of people everyplace you go, that’s pretty much the ideal best use case for a private car. […]

Wouldn't some kind of van be more practical? Perhaps they wanted both a van and a pickup truck, but they didn't want/couldn't afford 2 separate cars, so they just melded the two together?

No shot that's a real/unmodified model... right?

"Chai Tea: FIGHT ME ABOUT IT" by Hank Green ^[1]

It’s not a phobia […]

For the sake of argument, Merriam-Webster defines the "phobia" suffix as:

intolerance or aversion for ^[1]

as well as

exaggerated fear of ^[1]

That being said, one can define a words however they wish — imo, all that matters is that those engaged in a conversation together all use the same definitions. If you would like to reserve the "phobia" suffix to represent only "exaggerated fear of", what would you propose in its stead to represent "intolerance or aversion for"?

Here's Hawking on Epstein's island in 2006 ^[1.1]:

Driver tip...?

If I had to change the voting age, I would personally be more inclined to raise it rather than lower it.

No worse than the adult population. […]

At what age would you say that a child (ie someone that is not an adult) brain is equal, in terms of rationality (assuming that is a sufficient metric to gauge one's fitness for voting in an election), to that of an adult brain? Or are you saying that a child brain of any age is equal to an adult brain?

Hm, if I understand you right, you're saying that there's there's a sort of threshold of governance (eg you mention legally being allowed to work, and being required to pay taxes) that, once met, requires that those under such governance must have representation in the government. So, by that logic, would you then be okay with children not being allowed to vote if, say, they weren't allowed to work, and didn't have to pay taxes?

Kawaii is 100% open source, but due to the extremely challenging nature of the build, no assembly guide or build tutorial is provided. ^[1]

🙁