Don't forget to put a rosy-red Nord Stream cherry on top, sprinkle with sweet cash from threefold-priced LNG, add a pinch of Ukrainian blacksoil and a few drops of "Bleeding Russia" (stirred, not shaken) - there's your "Freedom (c) and Democracy^tm" pie recipe. Serve hot-handed.

I bet, the vast majority of them at least.

lol another clueless lame.ee liberal mad

Step 1: Teach history of capitalism; Step 2: Frame it as "history of gommunizm" - pure projection, as always; Step 3: Profit

..failure to send weapons..

An interesting way to put it when in reality they just don't have shit. Of course, one would have to admit that the reason is de-industrialization, which in turn puts into question capitalism. On the other hand, drinking your own koolaid too much is going to convince you that the "Asiatic hordes" are incapable of outproducing "the Garden". Anyway... Fuck the west

It's either benign ignorance or a potentially problematic take. In any case... While they have a lot of decent stuff, they are not explicitly Marxist, thus the critical eye must be even more vigilant.

Sad Tucker Carlson face

I wish ye all black and tans a very merry fight me like a man

The majority of Republikans are liberals too. In the classical sense of the word. Calling chuds "liberals" melts that place of theirs where the brain is usually supposed to be.

And yet, Cuba is on the US list of state sponsors of terrorism. Not so-called "Israel", no. Cuba

Something something meat waves something something projection

Along with abducting entire villages into conscription, throwing old, disabled people into the grinder, and forming full-blown Banderayouth squads.

A less honest way of saying: "we're doing what the Nazis did in 1945"

Mentally

Perhaps they do, but they want the audience to think otherwise. The reason is obvious: even if the weapons aren't there and there's no industrial capacity to produce them in adequate quantities - MIC contractors can squeeze the most out of the situation.

Its border with Ukraine is also quite long, and that border is more porous than you think. It is not impossible for a handful of men to manage to cross it unnoticed through some of the more wooded areas.

I mean, yeah... Still, there was a freaking car chase! You would expect a certain level of stealth from these motherfuckers. The car was tracked with cameras and drones. Whatever they were trying to do - I'd bet on the Russians capturing them asap.

Terrorists lie. Don’t take anything they say at face value.

Absolutely, agree. It's just that... I just expected a cold stone-face motherfucker, not someone in complete disarray

This sounds to me like a covert attempt by the US to escalate the situation further by trying to destabilize Russia, an attempt to force their hand, which would create a possible justification to pull more European NATO troops (French, presumably?) into Ukraine. And I word it this way because NATO soldiers are already present in Ukraine.

Considering the fact that the absolute ghoul Lindsey Graham visited Kiev recently, and also the fact that he and other US representatives called upon Kiev to up the people-snatching efforts, urging the fascist junta to speed up mobilization law adoption – this looks to me like the US is worried that the AFU is heading towards collapse, and that they believe it could happen sooner than they would want, thus endangering the upcoming presidential elections, and the only way they could postpone this is to get Europe involved. By the way, we have several videos circulating the Internet – one is from Romania, and there are dozens of tanks and other heavy machinery that are presumably being moved to the Ukrainian border. Some of these tanks are American. Not to mention the fact that the US embassy issued a warning, urging American citizens to refrain from spending time in crowded places, and the ass-toad-in-chief Vicky Nuland blabbering about "nasty surprises".

There are certain things that do not make sense to me. Firstly, Russian sources claim that this was a carefully planned operation. Which isn’t hard to believe – we’re talking getting into Moscow (heavily armed with military-grade assault rifles, flammable liquid, perhaps even explosive devices), getting past security, staying there unnoticed until the right moment (and that’s amid the warnings that the US embassy issued to American citizens), killing a whole bunch of people in cold blood, burning the place down, and getting out successfully. All of which these pieces-of-shit-dogs, whoever they are, succeeded at doing, by the way.

And then we get videos, published by Russian law enforcement operatives – we see a stuttering mess of a terrorist, trembling like hell and barely standing on his knees, saying he was promised a “hefty” pay of around half a million, up to 1M rubles (which is around 7-8K USD, if I remember correctly) by some (allegedly) unknown person who contacted him over Telegram. This is the same person, apparently, who hours ago slaughtered innocent people like it was child play.

It looks very much like the operation you could expect Ukrainian Nazi terrorists like Budanov would conduct. Also – there’s the fact that the men were supposedly trying to reach the border with Ukraine near Belgorod (which is strange, given the fact that there are still border clashes going on AFAIK, RU military/security services presence is guaranteed – why go there? You’ll almost certainly get caught). But aside from the obvious bloodthirst of the fascists in Kiev - do they really not have any sense of self-preservation?

This alone doesn’t mean, however, that Ukraine was behind the attack – rather Ukraine was an obvious escape route, since it is the closest ally and US/CIA puppet, a destination point you take off to if you wanted to escape Russia quickly. Which brings another question to mind – why escape? If the operation is indeed carefully planned, would it not be easier to hide inside Russia, or at least cross the border later, elsewhere, and not in a haphazard way, on the same fucking car you supposedly came to Crocus in the first place?

But there's also western media outlets who, one after the other, starting to parrot claims of "ISIS taking responsibility", which sounds like a very obvious attempt at deflecting blame from Ukraine.

Adding to the picture, there’s been a statement by Dmitry Peskov not long before the terrorist attack, who stated that “we cannot allow a hostile state, hellbent on taking Crimea, the Donbas and other new territories, to exist”, or something of that ilk. Which is an ambiguous statement, as it could be interpreted in at least two ways – either this Ukrainian state is transformed, all this bullshit about NATO and taking Crimea etc. wiped off from the Constitution (which would probably necessitate a regime change, which would be very based), or this Ukrainian state is to be dismantled altogether. IDK, maybe the US monsters are starting to realize that Russia is getting tired of playing with the Nazis, and the only way to buy time is to escalate further.

Where's Japan? We need the whole circus

These annoying little fascist NATO puppets are not even paper tigers at this point, these are yapping paper chihuahuas.

I think you could also find this post useful. It's got a few links that might be of interest to you