Skip Navigation
Jump
High framrate single player campaign
  • The typical human reaction time to visual stimulus is ~250 milliseconds. On a 60hz screen you need to wait 17ms for the frame to appear, then 250ms before you're able to react. 267ms total. Switch to a 144hz screen and you only need to wait 7ms for the frame to appear, then 250ms to react. 257ms total. I'm sure that 10ms saving makes a huge difference...

    1
  • Jump
    PC Gamer 2015: Let's stop calling ourselves the 'PC Master Race'
  • Not only that, but PCMasterRace implies a certain tolerance for memes and shitposting. PCGaming sounds like a serious community that's actually about gaming. PCMR is a silly name for a silly place.

    13
  • Jump
    Finding the limits of video compression technology
  • As a photography nerd, I feel it's my duty to point out the vintage camera on the right has a higher resolution than even the imax camera on the left. Much lower frame rate and a lot more processing delay, but better image quality.

    15
  • Jump
    High Speed Rule
  • Try looking at somewhere that does have high-speed rail, rather than only considering Amtrak's broken offering.

    As an example; consider the journey from Paris to Nice. It's a 580 mile drive taking ~9 hours, a 1.5 hour flight costing £129 or a 5.5 hour train ride costing £71.

    Once you include the hassle and time required for airport security, the gap between the train and plane closes significantly. 1.5 hours flying plus 2 hours at the airport before takeoff and another half hour after landing takes it up to 4 hours already, rather than the train where you can just walk into the station and get on. Then there's the comfort and facilities on-board. A cramped economy flight Vs a comfortable train with leg room, space to move around, charging plugs, etc.

    When you look at it like this, is it worth spending nearly twice as much for a slightly faster but less comfortable journey? High speed trains excel over middle-distance journeys, too long to comfortably drive but too short for flying to really make sense. Imagine a train that would take you from the San Diego to the centre of San Fransisco in less than 5 hours, running 10+ times per day and costing less than flying. That's the reality of high speed rail in many countries. Can you really not see a market for it in the USA?

    0