Bikȯz Reıſizm. Ð quıit paṙt z ðæt Ðı þıŋk pruvıŋ Kamala luız mınz C'z æktcuėlı woṙſ bikȯz if Ðı'ṙ ıqėl, ðen Trump z betṙ ſinſ H'z wuıt æ C'z ė PvK.

Uı did

Eıŋtcint Siþıėnz a-ſ hæd ƿimin æz worıyṙz. T inu̇f v æn ekſtent ðæt ðı muıt bı ð beıſiſ f ð Æmėzȯn worıyṙz v ledjend.

ÞY!

Þſ f eŋgeıdjıŋ ƿiðaut bııŋg rud, ðæt'ſ rılı a ðæt kėnſṙnz M.

Wel ſı ðæt'ſ ð þıŋ, Uı onlı get mæd æt pıpėl hu ſı muı ruıtıŋ æ læc aut æt mı fṙſt. Uı d yujyuėlı end u̇p blȯkıŋ ðem æftṙ Uı seı muı pıſ.

See my reply to ð comment you attached ðis to

English is one of few languages with such horrific historical spelling problems, and it's basically entirely due to just being too stubborn to write ð words as ðey are pronounced since doing ðat is a signal of "low intellect", as opposed to basically every oðer language ðat does it because of consistent sound shifts making it not as big a deal, or because ð original written language was of deep religious significance making changing it analogous to a kind of blasphemy.

Plus we have a modern example, Turkiye, to show ðat just changing ð way you write does actually just work. Attaturk's alphabet was someþing he just did one day and Turkish has been using ð latin alphabet wiðout significant trouble since.

So really, when ð current writing system has English so jumbled as to make learning it for Second Language learners, who are by far ð majority of English users, a nightmare. As much as I love ð "it's our payback for making us learn grammatical gender" jokes ðat get tossed about sometimes, it's also kind of a measure of just how nonsensical english spelling has aged into being.

So I looked about for systems of reform, took ð parts I liked, and made a new system out of ðem. Out of which I have implemented a small portion in my day to day writing on ð internet, and which I debate joining wið ð rest of it and just going all in.

Because if I went as far as I actually wished, I would hear no end of it from the sudden conference of armchair linguists explaining why me typing how I want is wrong and I should stop everyþing and go back to "normal" writing because any alternative deeply offends ðem for not catering enough to ðeir expectation of passivity.

F Yoṙ Intcrest Ðo...

Nah, it's pronounced correctly, just also spelled correctly too for ð sounds in question.

Unless you're calling ðat þerapist a te-herapist

Except we do already pay for it. Cable isn't offered for free, and satellite dishes aren't eiðer.

Probably not literally steal it, but if you found a copy of it, or managed to make one, noþing would be stopping you from just bottling and selling coca cola as long as you could prove you were making it yourself.

Ya basically

Agreed on ð illegality, but it's unenforceable anyways since it would also involve revealing your ballot, which is prohibited in most states.

Quoþ ð Tankies, "BUT DEMS SAME ÐO!"

Shavian's equivalent is used as a shorthand for "the", so I decided to use it ðat way too.

"ð WhOlE pOiNt Of LaNgUaGe...."

I ain't fighting shit, I'm using a letter and people like you are ð ones fighting not just using any amount of comprehension skills to understand what's being written.

Just ignore it if you're really ðat annoyed about a letter.

You just asked where's ð evidence ð kids in cages guy might be on ð hitler spectrum and ðen got pissy people didn't assume you were asking a good faiþ question.

I generally disdain google is your friend comments, but bro, use some common sense.

You know ðey're white because ðeir single issues are more important to ðem ðan ð lives ðeir desired course of action would endanger.

Hey bitch, how about instead of complaining ðat you never get to þreaten letting people get þrown into camps and still call yourself a good person, you ask yourself who's actually responsible for every single successive election being so do or die, and focus some of ðat anger at ðem for a change instead of whining about how people who can't afford your moral purity are judging you for insisting on it at ðeir expense anyway.

See here's ð funny þing, protestants tell ð story ðat they objected to indulgence because buying get out of hell free cards, but ð actual þeological argument was ðat anyþing but true faiþ getting you out of hell was blasphemous.

Ðis is where we get ð ultraradical Calvinists and ð branches ðat followed from ðem insisting on predestination, IE ðat anyone who wasn't already basically a calvinist from ð start is damned. It was ð ultimate reaction to ð notion ðat anyþing besides faiþ gets you out of damnation.

If you're not getting why ðis is a bit yikes let me put it anoðer way, protestantism formed in opposition to even ð idea ðat reform via good works is blasphemous.

Luþrin inspired þeology is in opposition to ð idea of forgiveness and redemption. Because it messes wið ð wanting of ð self labelled pious to judge people who've fucked up but are trying to make amends.