Don't Google and Facebook (and maybe Redhat?) also contribute a lot to open source software? I get that stuff like chromium and android is open source but not really free as in freedom but you can't deny they do contribute somewhat.

Genuinely interested in what people think about, maybe I'm not seeing the whole picture.

It's both wrong? But racism is not the word to use here

They should've paid for this to be on the radio instead

I understand that but what would you serve on this plate, an apartment in new york city?

500k/plate...

How??? I'd genuinely like to know how one achieves this.

My only complaint with Mull is the 60hz lock. I know it's inevitable if you want 'resist fingerprinting' enabled, but it is really noticeable after using 120hz for a while.

I can't help but think it should be possible as it's a client-sided issue, and there is no reason the browser can't simply advertise itself as 60hz but actually allow 120hz scrolling, but this is something for Mozilla to fix.

Yes vehicle important

Can you use a mouse in nano? I always just use the arrow keys, or page up/down and home/end

I mostly use vim but I barely use the jkl; to navigate the document.

Ahh I see, so including the text

Why though? It looks so weird my first thought was "Don't feel like posting today so...I used AI to do it for me".

Clearly this is not what you meant but, still, I agree with the other guy, you couldn't find a normal picture?

uBlock with "Cookie Notices" and "Annoyances" ticked on. Filter lists tab.

You raise valid points and thank you for the detailed answer. It's a shame wasm isn't hardware accelerated, is that because of security or is it simply not implemented yet? (i can google this but I'm just wondering.) I agree that being able to call on a web browser is perhaps less necessary because of the phone having to be linked anyway, but it still would be nice to have :)

Doesn't discord support video calls in the browser? Surely it cant be the e2e being the problem here? I didn't know about the WASM overhead, I always thought of it as near native but I guess that's not the case then? Websockets should work fine though right?

Well they probably could get it to work in the browser it's just that they didn't. I wonder why?!

If you want you can try OnlyOffice, it works really well as a replacement for Office. That is if you only use Word, Excel and Powerpoint. I even convinced some Windows people to use it as its free, open source, cross platform and perhaps even easier to use at this point.

For Picasa maybe digikam? It maybe isn't a perfect replacement though. You could always try to run Picasa in a VM (or maybe even wine?)

Username checks out but this standard was deprecated in the late 90s lol

I'm starting to suspect I just didn't get the joke

This definitely makes me confused. I thought their whole thing was that they were a proxy for google results??

As far as I know it is just an ffmpeg wrapper

Yes I use Mull but this does not look like a Firefox-based browser

Bromite and Cromite are a thing too