Skip Navigation
Jump
Instances that don't require email or human verification?
  • @Newccaccount

    Hyperliterate in one, semi-literate in two, and a self-taught programmer in three.

    1
  • Jump
    This. Is. Ridiculous.
  • Permanently Deleted

    2
  • Jump
    This. Is. Ridiculous.
  • Yeah, where's the other half?

    2
  • Jump
    Lemmy.world deleting posts with archive links and posts questioning the decision.
  • @Rentlar @nxlemmy

    A policy is built by informed consent. There has to be a process and a reasoning and human hands who can be held accountable when things aren't done right. I don't think any Fedi instances are doing "policy" by that definition. And that's entirely because they don't want their users/trolls to use/game the system, I believe.

    8
  • Jump
    Instance Protectionism in the Threadiverse happens because of the Prisoner’s Dilemma (protecting one's own instance is currently more sensible than increasing overall discussion quality)
  • @Mane25 @blue_berry

    In my experience, the problem with small instances isn't content quality or community, it's moderator/administrator transparency and competency.

    -1
  • Jump
    What do you think some of the fediverse's primary stumbling blocks are?
  • @Feathercrown @modulus

    I'd be more comfortable with self-hosting my actual data somewhere, and just having an instance or the central store point to my data. I'd want to get to apply rules for who gets access to my data. It would be a lot easier to spin up a small data store with a few tools on it than a full instance.

    1
  • Jump
    Would you explore space if given the chance? Why or why not?
  • @Euraru

    Not with what we currently have for technology and knowledge. So not in my lifetime will that be a practical option.

    4
  • Jump
    Could the fediverse extend to e-commerce?
  • @cakeistheanswer @Wijnie

    They hopefully will also notice how LOW engagement is with ads, and retreat accordingly.

    2