Technically, yes, the offensive does consume like 3x of what is needed for defense the same position, but it works right only if that's a war of equals. Ukraine was and is underpowered on it's own, and even with the stuff other countries donated. Them gaining an edge in the warzone in the last years often involved either technological trickery or great insights and tactics using their limited resources.

One other thing that breaks that rule and makes this change in the narrative significant - is that russians could deploy their bombers, fuel, supply centers near the border, thinking they can't get effecrively hit, that giving them a big boost whatever they do, and if this handicap gets denied, they'd have a harder time supplying another operation from further away.

What analogy? I didn't draw any direct comparison, I think. Was there one?

Arms are given to Ukraine with every state dictating how they should not be used, with Ukraine being autonomous in their decision-making – as it sounds, they consult other countries, but decide things themselves. To my brief knowledge of past wars it was usually a 'use how you want' deal or a direct involvement and control from other party with boots on the ground, both don't fit this exact situation. And it becomes even more unique since there are not one party, but a lot of them, all citing their own conditions on exact shipments, adding even more confusion to the situation.

I want to highlight the fact it's one of the first very public case of countries donating weapons with such policies limiting their usage against enemy troops.

Yep. But half way through it I don't see him mentioned.

Saneek (don't confuse it with Sonic™ or Sonichu©) is my spiritual animal.

Every war is weird it's own way, but that thing is probably unprecedented. How can a war-torn country fight having one hand strapped to the back with a country having 4x it's population and resources? And still managing to resist after 2,5 to 10 years of warfare? Imagine that in fiction and you'd call it unbelievable.

I'd up that to 95% and I feel it's for our own good,

Somewhen in the 00s I had a probably friendship-breaking argument with a pal of mine about the whole 'patriotism' thing. Indeed, we lost any connection in the following years, and I suppose that was one of the reasons. Back then, we couldn't formulate what patriotism is, and he stood on the ground of defending this ephemeral construct while I was all for ditching it.

In the coming years I repeatedly reevaluated what it is for me, and for others, and for the state. While the state's position is obvious - patriotism is like an oath you take when you enter military service to unconditipnally follow what the state wants. For others it's a mixed bag, greatly defined not only by the great achievements of the past, but by insecurity that they'd lose even more if their tsar lose support, and the state how it is, even openly criticized, guarantees our material conditions would decline slowly and for a right reason, while the other choice is a chaos that would turn everything upside down like it was in the 90s.

For me, personally, the patriotism started to be a thing after I had a conversation with a lot of people from different regions and backgrounds. We, after all, a family that lives in a large house. Some of the rentees are deeply consumed by the war and the state propaganda, some aren't, but in the end we all share the same living space and would continue to do so whatever happens. What we all share though, and what led to such a degradation, is a decline in material and social conditions orchestrated by the kremlyads. And if there's a patriotism in loving your country and your own contrymen, it goes against the current admin, them stealing everything and sending our men into a meatgrinder, them bankrupting our culture, them exchanging our future to get loans from the likes of Iran and China, them giving handshakes or handjobs to Talibs and Kim.

A russian patriot, if there's one, gonna hate these phoney moves by the state instead of education, hate how it strips russian people bare and send them to die because it felt like it, hate how in a course of an endless VVP admin we turned from a promising country with a hope of establishing a democracy with living wages we turned into pariahs that can't even leave that bestest vision of the Motherland if we aren't rich like top propagandists do owning multiple properties in Europe. What I see the best for my country is not aligned with what 'The collective West' (as dumbfucks call it) wants us to do, it is to our own egoistic interest to return to the path of development and reinclusion into the world of less shitty states, because it would lead to us not having a second thought about buying okayish meat and bread instead of priced down garbage when we do groceries, and would make us raise kids without a fear that they'd be put down for some greater good.

I'm surprised BC hasn't been ruined by Epic yet. At the time of a deal I was very afraid for them declining fast but I still don't see any effect on the platform. I guess EG has that much money they don't need to milk BC for what ammounts to a pocket change for them. They just wanted their presence in that market too.

!remind me in 5 years, lol

Besides checking these address and phone number (did anyone check them?), the printer that produced these may be IDed if it leaves special secret marks:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots

What are you talking about lmao.

You being slapped for saying 'retarded' is 1984 once again kek.

You are just insensitive. Work on it.

The last one about a backup is a great idea. Not because some receipt can be misleading, but because my 20y+ with Windows showed me it has some temper on it's own and can kick back for no reason.

I wish you to get it right without a problem.

I used my baby mittens with you because I felt you just started your internet journey.

I'm not feeling 'vein enough' if you are incapable to read the room.

this whole thread is proof of that.

Sadly, I can't dictate my choice of clothes in different settings, so I probably need a universal holder.

Define non-violent language first. Or rather isolate the sorts of language that don't offend you personally. That's what you want to describe and defend I suspect.

I would.

My doomscrolling device is some 4.5 inches (?), that's smaller than average. I would have liked a Steve Jobes' standard small screen like from the first iPhones, but I can't buy a small smartphone anymore thanks to their producers, and the smallest I can get without sacrificing hardware and app compatibility doesn't fit my big hands anymore. Like, I can't use that cheap small model without placing my little finger under it's bottom side to support it.

I'd see in the mirror if I have an a-word pass for that.

My phone when placed in front pockets hits my belly or my leg when I'm on the go or sitting and makes moving that side uncomfy because it's placed right in the place that warps a lot. I'm probably looking for an accesory that can hold it on my long straight bones.

Maybe, since my complection is a bit unstandard for my place. Thus I wish to probably outsource that one thing to a fitting accessory because I don't feel like I can afford a tailor's work.

As it happens, it organically goes down to who owns the platform. In our conversation if it could've happened IRL, there could be two parties of equal rights (to just leave?). In a context of, say, a D&D party or a small gathering\chat, roles are equal with some privilege to the one who collected people together. In the case of some public space on the internet, like a US-based Facebook (as per the article about eating cats), we have Meta's oversight, then government's oversight, then community's admins oversight, then users' own shit filter. And in the later case, it gets a bit more complicated because it's established that we let that state use our agency for our own good, then we let a corporation take our agency in their own hands to dictate what it should be by registering on that platform, and then we participate in some community with it's own rules and mods, and only then other people who can report one's post to one of these previous ones. That's how the delegation of opinion to other parties usually works.

But your question is not about how it is, but how it should be. And for that I'd prefer to go down to the second level, when a club and it's admins set up rules for communication of individuals on their platform, like a Lemmy instance, and users have a saying about how they see the future of their instance and a liberty to quit it. If that doesn't fit you, you skip town and join another one, or create one yourself. That level of agency has it's flaws, probably, but it's better because less parties with different privileges are involved there, and you communicate with only admins and other users without that becoming too complicated.

On the side note though, I need to note, that I as a foreigner from an absurdly conservative country started to refuse myself from using the f@g90t slur that is set deep inside my language to describe a lot of bad things casually. That is because I want to communicate with people and communities that don't want it there, and as I don't see any value in this particular slur, therefore I just adapt. I find that a couple of guys I work with wouldn't like that either, because they are called that by people I despise and don't want to be associated with. I don't feel like researching the cases when I or them can call someone a f@g9ot, I just dropmit because people I personally care about find it uncomfrotable. And our language, just like a snake, keeps cliding on top of a dune changing it's direction whenever most people of it's users gets some new catchy word or retire an old word as unacceptable.