I mean i don't hate them and i do acknowledge their benefits but they're primary goal is for enterprise. Slowly many more such software will be pushed onto the average user and it might become something you cannot replace just like what happened with systemd.
That's what makes it even easier. They can push the narrative that the xorg developers were fed up and started working on wayland.
It's not worth it if my post gets deleted by the time i finish writing anything
I love Wayland
Why?
RedHat said so
What does that have to do with Wayland?
RedHat is my overlord!!!!1!1!1!!!
Average Wayland shill
The paid moderators keep deleting my posts just becuase of slighly criticising red hat. What do you want me to do? Expect replies from a deleted post?
Is wayland the horse here. That would make sense. Xorg would be the car since it is objectively better and actually works. The only "benefits" of wayland would be similar to saying horses are better since they don't contribute to global warming.
I recognize my inability to contribute. What I do understand is if red hat truly cared a tiny bit about desktop linux they would have intervened in the 18 year history of wayland. They're either afraid of acknowledging the fact that 18 years went down the drain or they are doing it on purpose. Mostly the latter.
Progress is good but the other reasons are fundamental faults of wayland. You cannot "fix" them, the only solution is to make X12. And no wayland is not X12.
5 days ago actually. But the jannies who are red hat employees removed it. Its sad they infiltrate not only reddit but now lemmy.
The fact that such a thing exists shows the intentional flaw. Why should an application write different code for multiple compositors? It's almost like they want devs to feel frustrated.
Apps have to rewrite code for every compositor. This is intentionally shitty design.
Wayland is freedom restricting, in that way I'm actually fighting social injustices