Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BR
Posts
0
Comments
61
Joined
4 wk. ago
  • Totally reasonable. I don't shuck anymore, so I don't have the concern of getting the wrong disk.

    I've personally never had a problem with their returns before. But I haven't had a doa disk out of their "renewed" internal disks yet.

  • Specifically the renewed drives sold by Amazon. They are the returned/refurbished drives. I've probably bought 10 or so in the last few years and that's how they've all come. I haven't had a failed drive out of them yet. (Seagate 22tb and WD reds 18tb)

  • I've been rewatching Bullshit! recently and found myself disagreeing with him quite a lot. I used to like the show a lot, and the same as you it helped build my skepticism. Some episodes are still good, some have aged terribly.

  • This is why scraping LinkedIn works so well. Using the consistent email format gets you to your target easily. I've used it to get the contact info of the CTO of American Airlines before (his auto-reply included his cell number.)

  • A good 5 years ago or so I was getting a breakfast burrito when an older couple came in asking for directions. They had an old school mapbook. It took a minute to orient myself, but I found they were on the wrong page.

    Its one of my bucket list items, but an old school road trip with nothing but a mapbook and a compass. No real destination, no time frame. Just the open road and exploring. And no GPS to make it efficient or optimized where I'll soar right past everything.

  • And here's your gun

  • Because gun control is often written by people who don't understand guns and by people who don't like guns. They also often are written and proposed without much input from gun owners. I'm not against gun control necessarily, but many attempts are just stupid legislation that would be ineffective in meeting it's goal of decreasing gun crimes.

    So many gun control laws proposed are unenforceable such as storage laws.

    Assault weapon bans use arbitrary features to distinguish them. And many of these are features that make them easier to control when shooting, which inherently means they are more dangerous now.

    I really think there is a huge cultural issue around guns that needs to be addressed. Guns are thought of and treated as a solution to disagreements rather than something to protect life and liberty. A solution that is as equally valid is running away or compromising. These are made worse with rhetoric like "fuck around and find out" or " come try that here."

    We also have media that has been purposely trying to divide the populace and make them afraid. Afraid when they leave their house all the time and afraid that someone is going to come into their house.

    We have a lot of issues surrounding guns. And while gun control will be a feature of tackling it, so much more needs to be done to address it.

  • Not the rich, but politicians, police leadership, and DAs.

    They don't want to talk about how murders can go unsolved and crime unpunished in the cities they manage and protect.

    They want to demonstrate that when they show up in force they are able to quickly solve a crime and bring a criminal to justice. One, so they can keep getting elected and two so that others don't think they can get away with committing crimes.

    The DA will want to push a conviction so that they look tough on crime for their political campaigns. Often times withholding evidence that might harm their case.

    I don't know if it happened in this case, but it has happened before where police will railroad a suspect to get a conviction even if there is clear evidence they couldn't have committed the crime.

  • I think you misunderstood. I don't think shooting up a dealership was useful.

    My issue is in the fear of making a martyr has been a big discourse which has lead to inaction. In the hundreds of political discussions I've been a part of leading up to the last election it became a recurring theme that people thought Trump couldn't even be arrested or held accountable for the many crimes he has committed.

    Which lead us to a duality where either Trump was a martyr persecuted and having it stimulate his base or we let Trump continue to not experience any consequences and continue to rally his base unimpeded. It became a no-win situation at the outset when we started being afraid of making a martyr.

    While we don't want to do anything that will unduly increase support of Trump or Elon. The use of words like martyr doesn't do much to help us. I agree we need to be smart about what we do, but I also think we need to be mindful of the language we use and the connotation that it has.

  • I hate this fear of making the opposite side a martyr. I've been hearing it for arresting and prosecuting Trump for so long. People making that claim basically let him face no consequences and look where that got us. As opposed to "making him a martyr" and who knows where we'd be. At the very least, they'd have had to regroup and change their game plan.

    We can't keep being paralyzed into inaction by the fear of "making a martyr."