Grimy @ Grimy @lemmy.world

Posts

80

Comments

2,295

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

You couldn't even look through the comments? It isn't.

Everyone is quick to cheer on the copyright companies, but trials like these have far reaching implications. If you have to pay for the data, open source ai dies overnight. There are only a few companies that have the budget for that kind of investment.

They confirmed community servers. There is even a level editor built with Godot.

These kind of images seem to be asking for harsher punishment for piracy in general. It's basically databroker propaganda.

The message is never "we can do it too, its clearly moral" but always "they shouldn't be doing it".

The Netflix series felt very different then the book. I found the mystery aspect in the first part of the book the most interesting, but the show completely skipped it. So the show wasn't bad but I was still disappointed.

We need to censor these AIs even more, to protect the children! We should ban them altogether. Kids should grow up with 4chan, general internet gore and pedos in chat lobbies like the rest of us, not with this devil AI.

Which person?

I for Vendetta

The team I work with is 13 women, an other guy and me. There is zero bullshit to deal with, it's great. It does really put it in perspective. Every other workplace I was a part of, it always seemed to be other men that were hard to work with, never women.

Maybe I just got lucky but I'm going to attribute it to the gender ratio. Although the type of work might have something to do with it, the other places were more blue collar.

You're conflating your workplace with every other. Most dont work in financial IT with its stringent security measures.

I would never trust

Nothing output by an AI is verified

You can't trust yourself to verify it? Are you a monkey unable to read its output and conclude if it properly rewrote and reformatted what you gave it?

If I give it the info and it formats it in a table, I'm not trusting it with anything, I'm literally checking it right after. Still faster then me typing the table by hand.

It can cite its sources, so if I'm trying to learn about a subject or getting info on a product/service, I just click the links it gives me.

It's easy to learn how to use these tools properly. You can also not use them, like, just don't. It's fine. I don't get the tantrum everytime the subject comes up and the constant gatekeeping tho.

"The pilot is dying in that bathroom, I can hear him fighting for his life"

The original 3.5 during the first month was peak creativity. The censorship really does ruin them.

Our soul lives in our DNA. There are no dino ghosts for the same reason we can't bring them back. We can't have them, in this world or the next.

I wouldn't let my children use ai, just like I wouldn't let them talk to strangers? The list of drawbacks are basically a list for using the internet in general in the first place. It's some serious "video games are dangerous vibes"

You work in IT, so you are clearly too good at coding to need it in small scripts and your environment is too complicated for the bigger thing. But don't you have documentation to write, Excel sheets, test scripts, etc. ?

I find uses. It's rewriting information I give it and everything is verified, I'm able to read and tweak it's output like an adult. Clearly your coworkers are also finding uses, if you have to deal with the fallout (lol).

Entertainment is valid. This is a meme community, the bar is if it make me laugh. I prefer proper OC, but I'll take AI OC over reposts any day.

On the environmental front, I think it's overstated. I use mostly local llms, so my impact is the same as playing a demanding game. Data centre's serve a lot of people, we just need a renewable grid and better laws so they aren't put in places with no water just because it's cheaper for them. The real problem is transport, both cars and flights, and shipments of consumer goods. Any activity that's solely technology driven is better for the environment imo.

As a preface, that's a very emotional comment that makes you look like a child throwing a tantrum. I will touch on a few things anyways.

You act like both sides are the same but only one is gatekeeping. I don't care if you use it, I won't ask you too. Sure Google is shoving down your throat but take it up with them. As an individual, I won't ostracize you for doing whatever you want.

On the other hand, as an individual, you are brigading, being belligerant, trying to force it out of our community and in general being a little baby about it.

I also think it's completely laughable to say it has no uses. I think this is really a work experience/domain thing tho. If you don't work in an office and don't use computers, I guess it can come off that way. And that's only if you don't consider entertainment a use case.

My uncle says the same thing about Hunter Bidens laptop. The fact is a the truth of the information is always relevant.

I'm pretty sure there are more people mindlessly hating on AI then there are of peeps sipping for it on lemmy.

We are talking about using ai to make memes? What is blowing up in our face in this scenario?

False information is still false information. You could find a way to justify Fox News with those arguments.

There is quite a huge open source community which let's you fine tune it however you want.