IMO at least one of those omitted words was not unnecessary

That's kind of an unnecessary leap.

The curve is clearly concave-down, indicating that, in fact, the number of facts per fact decreases as facts increase.

NYTimes reports that IDF claims Hamas killed them shortly before they were found. I thought I recalled seeing elsewhere that they were claimed to have been shot, but I can't find that source at the moment.

Of course, how credible is the IDF?

they get audited, at least, yearly by law

The IRS doesn't audit annually, companies hire 3rd party auditors. And it's not a tax requirement, it's a public-company requirement.

Yes there is a difference, but LLC is a legal concept, not a tax one. The IRS taxes sole proprietors the same whether or not they have an LLC.

Tax entities include sole proprietorship (default), partnerships, s corps, c corps. Any of those can be LLCs, but they don't have to.

Profitability is just a proxy for whether someone is legitimately running a business, or just trying to save money on their hobby. Businesses can deduct expenses, hobbies cannot.

So if you are running an etsy store or an engineering company and buy a 3d printer to make parts, the cost of that 3d printer is subtracted from revenue for tax purposes. If your "business" is actually a hobby, it's not legally a business expense and therefore it's not deductible

(In the USA)

Now I have a virus :(

On the other hand, if it had been two women who had both agreed that the one cup was the worst ever, it would have been a sure thing.

From the article:

Conscientiousness, one of the Big Five personality traits, is defined as a tendency to control one’s impulses, be persistent, act dutifully, and live up to one’s obligations to others.

Conscientiousness has been linked to a variety of positive traits and behaviors, such as responsibility, dependability, hard work, goal orientation, self-control, and leadership. Some conscientious people, however, happen to be dogmatic, inflexible, unquestioningly obedient, and intolerant of uncertainty (i.e., they tend to see things in black-and-white).

Does nobody remember dolphinsex.org?

How many times did you reboot it?

Three, you always tell me to do three

Nah, I was born in 1987, and 2012 is definitely when it went to shit with the "tea party"

Well I wasn't conscripted to be on his detail (and neither were you) so i guess they didn't do all they could

Thank mr skeltal

Yeah.

I fear that my original comment might be misconstrued so I just want to make it (probably annoyingly) explicit:

• original comment: lawsuit is fake
• reply1: no it's real there's a case number
• reply2: oh well then it must be true
• my reply: well akshually the existence of the lawsuit is pretty clearly not fake (response to original and reply1) but yeah you're right it hasn't been tried and we don't have all the evidence to show that its contents were true or not

FWIW I fully believe Trump did this and worse, but that's just me

The lawsuit itself appears to be real, not fake.

The allegations may not be true.

It's subtle, but there's a difference

I assume MFBR was supposed to be MFBC, and you can see their summary of why they assessed the Guardian that way Here

We've probably already seen the major stuff from the house committees investigation. If this does anything, it will only make it a little more fresh