Yours is absolutely correct. Bidens , UK, Germans are a big time dumb people.

Man, this decade will bring the worst of us. Nazis in Europe and Hindutvavadi in India. Find me another planet

US will also be dead. Get over it. Lol. Russia and China is the future.

I am just wondering what's the point of this war even. Trump Republicans don't want this war but certainly all dems are into it. Russia seems have no interest to move or they are just happy with the pace of war 🤣

I am just wondering how western elite thought that Russia gaining all the Donbass, kherson and others would be beneficial for them. Lol 😂 . This ukraine thing is the biggest loss for the West and US

Lol good for RSS and China.

What diplomacy will you have with outright nazis lol. They are outright nazis . I am astounded by your CPC's nazi loving apologia. RSS is not even a valid party but a hidden paramilitary organization . Yeah man, next time if China supports RSS to suppress the commies/working class of India, I will outright defend US to hijack taiwan. Lol. I am not understanding why CPIM still oppose US in India. It should be tit for tat diplomacy.

Aryan is a loaded term to the westerners. It's like saying Swastika is a loaded thing in the West. In the east millions of hindus/buddhists use swastika as a symbol of devotion to god/karmic cycle for 3000 years. Our marxists journals and marxist historians always write about aryan migration and etc. They themselves wrote in the ancient sanskrit that Northern India is Aryavarta , why should I change my history for a man living in other side of the world genociding jews.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Āryāvarta

I’ve heard that some Hindutva types get around this by denying the Aryan invasions ever happened. Yes , they propagate aryans originated from India lol. I also think its a gross misunderstanding that Aryans "invaded" like they quashed every people , it might be plausible but how can these different languages of North India survive the onslaught of Sanskrit if the onslaught was massive. I think aryans rituals and norms got mixed up with local cultures and by these fusions a new society emerged which is vedic . There is a lot of confusion in that regard because southern people think (like here in the chat) Brahmins and upper caste don't belong to India or a certain region. This is largely abhorrent and shouldn't be practiced . India is largely mixed because of being a melting pot of different groups and people , Greeks , Kushans , Huns , Afghans , Turks , Babur all came and brought their culture and ethos . Indo aryans people brought their Vedas and theology. If we discard everything regarding Vedas ,Upanishads and the great epics then what should remain of India ? (the great dance , Indian classical music comes from Sama Veda )
Another thing yes , caste system existed from middle to late vedic age and it exists till now. The caste system is inbuilt into Hinduism because of ignorance and feudal mode of production in ancient society . Modern hindu groups are denying these allegations and its horrendous to justify it.

2. Shiva is a complicated god , he is destroyer of maya (avidya) or ignorance . Shivaism predates vedic religion and Siva mythologies and ethos were put into hindu puranas in late 600 CE. Shiva is actually not death but a man who won over maya (illusion of reality ) and he forever remains into this "bliss" state . He is poor , lives with ghosts , snakes , drinks poison . It is just to convey simple ethos and "brahman" is not with worldly pleasures and work. Brahman is gender less , formless , casteless and infinite. In Hinduism anything can be personal god (isharva) (some restrictions are obviously there ) . Shiva followers see Shiva as the absolute brahman , he has neither shape or gender (that what it is written by Sankara , he was a shivaite ) .

3. Moksha means liberation from cycle of birth and dying , here Sankara is saying there is some higher plain which goes beyond traditional concept of previous rituals and understanding .

lol RSS's aim is to capture Tibet and whole of south Asia to declare it as Hindu rashtra . And your country is not perfect that I know but still kind a weird to see hanging with true fascists.

Will you engage with Nazis ? RSS openly support Hitler and killing of jews and muslims alike .

I don't know what to say anymore. Maybe they are thinking to de escalate the situation around the borders or so but hindutva is fully fascist derived from 1930s fascist movements in Europe.

It was like today's World Uyghur congress and their testimonies that Trotsky went to American investigation committee to declare he was free from all allegations which was declared by the supreme court in USSR.

Bro you are a nazi and a racist to the core. 95 percent of Indians don't marry outside the caste, Southerners are no angelic people and are no superior to Northerners . I don't want to hear your justification for your utter BS. I am a communist not a fucking racist ambedkarite who hate brahmins for just for being brahmins . We commies hate the system not the people itself , you are no different from Nazis , just you have a caste cover to justify your northern hatred. You are getting a block from me. https://www.thehindu.com/data/Just-5-per-cent-of-Indian-marriages-are-inter-caste/article60099878.ece

Even Bihar has higher inter caste marriage than TN.. Lol, so much for caste free society in South India.

Southern Brahmins are not Southern people who were influenced by Sanskrit. They are Northern people who live in the South. - that's a ridiculous statement and a very racist one.

"these people, regardless of when they got here, have against all numerical odds, managed to keep themselves “genetically pure” for a very long time, and such an act can only be achieved via active caste-based discrimination" again a very racist statement , you can't say they managed keep their race pure . its unhistorical and unscientific statement similarly to Nazi racism.

The Brahmins of South India had mixed with ancestral South Indians and brahmins alone didn't drove the agenda , the state religion of Tamil was Hinduism in 200 BC. You know nothing of Indian history and have a sectarian view of Southern and Northern people. And people shouldn't follow Periyar and Ambedkar blindly . They drew their conclusions based on flawed colonial era theory that Aryans were solely north Indians , its not. The commies of India don't hate brahmins or southern/Northern people , we hate the inherent caste structure based on land ownership and economic inequality , whatever Periyar and Ambedkar has said they failed to grasp the main problem behind the caste , which is zamindari system and vast land ownership by upper caste , even Ambedkar has mentioned Northern kshatriyas are more powerful than Brahmins , why ? Because of land ownership .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pa3BV50PcLw&t=253s , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQX5LlJ7YXg You can search various research papers mentioned in the video. regarding Brahmins or not , A population living from 200 BC cannot be considered outsider by any logic.

These brahmins drove the sanskritization. This sanskritizing/brahminizing influence was more complete in Maharashtra and Odisha, and was totally complete in the Gangetic Plain This theory is utter BS , There is no indo Gangetic plain problem , Kabir , Meera , Chaitanya , Nanak came from North only. And a whole branch of CPIM originated from North.

No, there was sanskritization in the South during many hindu dynasties in Tamil Nadu it happened after 200 BC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism_in_South_India https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bharatanatyam

in China ?

USSR was very successful in their attempts. I recently watched a video from Uzbekistan in 1970s there was neither islamic fundamentalism or closures of mosques. Don't iterate the liberal propaganda that campaign against religion was a failure in USSR. The return happened due to the capitalism and chauvinists in every region of ex USSR states.

Bro there was saint Kabir, Meera, sufis etc. In their poems they always had written about the animosity and hatred between hindus and Muslims. British just sparked the tension in 20th century by aligning themselves with Hindus and Muslim fundamentalists. But obviously the partition was inevitable. There was either of the chauvinism, it's Islamic supremacist or Hindus. It was just a good moment in history of India that Nehru was socialist and secular oriented. Even his colleagues were pro hindu chauvinists like Sardar Patel and etc.

nope , there are brahmins in the South too.