Why would Hezbollah give the pagers they bought for military communication to civilians?
we all knew a fair chunk of the voters
You guessed it: Not allowed
I'm not saying it's as annoying to read as some 'dance around the issue' 'articles' from 'the other side', but the need to inject a truckload of related bagage into every sentence just devalues the entire effort.
Like, yes Kevin, we know this is bad. We know it doesn't spark joy in the hearts of Haitian children. But just act like you're half a journalist and give us a clear cut of the cold dry facts. Wrap up your emotional shit in a closing paragraph if it helps you convince yourself
It's not entirely lost. You can still use that time to work out, study, rape
Ho ho ho seems we got our gold medalist right here
I can agree that it's debatable whether it was a good idea, but how is it 'nonsense' that the fact that sunset clause makes the deal very awkward? Why do you think the Iranians wanted it in, if not for the freedom to just develop nukes later?
Also the Iranian regime think they have a good shot at going to paradise because they allow men to rape their child brides, amongst other horrific shit. I can see the case we don't want these kind of people with the power of nuclear weapons.
They just shifted their resources to the missile development side of the puzzle, and the deal itself would only limit their uranium enrichment for 15 years. It just kicked the can down the road to 2031 for Iran to have their nukes 'legally'.
He'll write them some firm words on the bombs
Tbh the idea under Obama to bait the Iranians to drop their religious nuclear nutjobbery with money was naive at best. Even under the agreement, they were doing everything they could to advance towards nukes.
I wouldn't suggest anyone to get into politics that can't come to terms with collateral damage
Of course, this was going to clash with his cuddledaddy image sometime
The genocidal fervor that Israel is displaying is only equaled by Germany in the 1940s.
Germans killed 15.000 per day for a while
Hutu's killed 8.000 per day
Funny thing: they did so in exchange for other countries recognizing their annexation of the Western Sahara. Their own little Palestine
So you're saying that because a religion allows you to choose which of God's commandments, carefully passed down through every generation, you personally want to follow based on your gut feeling, can't be shamed?
Why should the ones who choose to deny parts of their religion be seen as representative of it over those who've chosen to uphold them?
But they're all about freedom!
Freedom to appropriate some land
Why shouldn't I shame the religion because some people choose to ignore part of it?
To the Israelis that do this: yes
You have to remember that their religion teaches them that non-jewish humans are, well, 'not that important'
To put it mildly
During Arab Spring, the West was (naively) hoping that Libyans would rise against Gaddafi and create a democraty. When he saw what was happening, he threatened to a) flood Europe with migrants and b) expose Sarkozy's illegal campaign funds.
a) made him a political adversary, b) made them launch a military campaign to topple him