The hard part is "that add value". Not only it's hard to measure, but highly depends on scope of what is done
Well, terminology is to call scam promising that even a cat will be able to build a rocket with UI blocks "no-code".
Since using "no-code" usually ends up with writing code (usually in JavaScript, afaik), it would be more honest to not call it that, anyway, scammy promises aside
I find inability to record/screenshot (both audio and pictures) the most annoying. They actively broke call recording because "what if it's illegal", then published their own call recorder, but only in India, or something like that.
If I have something on screen I always can take a picture with another camera, creating obstacles doesn't add privacy, it only serves to deter the laziest of bad actors and actual fair users
For instance, social media apps and shopping apps will know if you took interest in something, not just guess based on time you observed the screen. Besides, they will think you liked something even if the reason was not that
The team I'm part of wants to ditch Nix in favour of just about anything, because no one wants to maintain Nix and everyone sees it as just source of problems :(
I agree that it was complicated to learn Nix for me, too, but now I see benefits in it but I can't make them change their mind and tired of trying. Nix could've been much easier to advocate for if the language itself wasn't this esoteric
Well, they will try to eat everything they can reach
I may be too far from Python to tell, but it looks kind of incorrect to equate the author and their product. What if Guido decides to stop contributing, will Python end then? Creators of Rust spoken about the fact that Rust went very much not the way they wanted it to, this doesn't make them not creators, nor does it make Rust not Rust
That's an interesting read, and his views are more extreme than I thought. But I sort of agree that some unification of terminology and legislation would make situation better (maybe just not in a way he proposes). E.g. age of consent may differ by about 6 years in different places, that's quite awful.
First of all, thank you for a thoughtful response, I was too snarky, sorry about that.
TL;DR: guess I'm just upset that there is no objective way of measuring how much knowledge is required, and trying to read everything from sources list would take forever.
Yeah, the last point is sort of a strawman, although I meant it not to highlight that explanations should be given in terms that the reader is used to, but rather that the reader may have quite arbitrary amount of prior knowledge.
I agree that there probably should be some shared context, what bugs me is that people tend to vary a lot in what amount of context is considered to be required. And more than once have I met papers that require deciphering even if you have some context and kind of come from the field they are written for. I used to think that this is our of malice to make reproducing their work harder for others, but maybe it was just an assumption of much larger shared context.
Tables markdown work in some clients, afaik, but I don't remember which, and even if I saw it or imagined it
Nah, this could've been possible with some clever fuckery in defining those emojis' unicode content, like with flags that are not a single point but three independent ones, allowing you to do this:
"🇧🇬".reverse() == "🇬🇧"
"🇬🇪".reverse() == "🇪🇬"
Afaik, comes from Latin that had no "U" and "V" was both vowel and consonant until some point in time.
So, you've got no issues with "g" being sometimes kinda "h", "j" being same kind of "h" always, "h" not being a sound a all, "d" sounding like "th", and "z" sounding like "th" but another "th", not the one for "d". Oh, and "c" sounding either like "k" or like the latter "th"
I know some people that claim that everyone should use Latin alphabet, because you then know what things sound like, but that is the most bullshit take I ever heard. I guess that knowing how to write letters helps, but it looks like every other language pronounces those letters different, and English makes extra effort to pronounce different even the same things
So, in the end you just do assume everyone to know the "common sense" one-letter notation for everything. Well, not everything, but the essential ten thousands of entities for sure /s
This sounds like No true Scotsman fallacy to me
I find it a bit contradicting to the very point you made about defining variables. If anything, one might be some home-grown genius that has real business getting into details but only ever used Chinese characters as variables
Edit: forgot to set language
So maybe one day our ugly Steam pages will be looked back on nostalgically.
I think, an important part of why this could happen is that it will be voluntary, while noisy ads are not opt-in. They usually are not even opt-out :(
I think, the intended way is to publish "News" about new games in your previous games, that way user can see it in newsfeed. I used to ignore it but now I read it more because it really has some useful stuff now and then.
a real company that respects players like Nintendo
Uh, well, okay. Comparing pop-up you show each time with a poster one gets single time with a physical product is already quite strange. Comparing discoverability of that era with discoverability in Steam is even stranger than that
Cosmic balance, sort of 😅
I forgot that last time was in 2023, although the previous one was in 2016. SO had a lot of moderation drama and point-grinders that (imo) led to community becoming more toxic, to the point where it's not too pleasant for me to participate in.
To be fair, they still have some good answers, and sometimes they can provide a useful answer, but edge-case rare obscure problems that seemed to be the very reason for SO are rarely answered now, as I see it
I was amazed to read that, too. At least, they seem to keep it polite and professional. Kent even agrees that Linus is acting because of the responsibility of the maintainer, not on a whim or out of spite
Deep in Putin's Russia, Ivanovo's George Orwell library is still lending books on totalitarianism.
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/831dc338-e554-4101-a80d-3020dfa7df05.jpeg)
Dystopia in the books has stark contrasts, great oppression, heroic moves. A boring real-life dystopia seems to mainly consist of tired people trying to cope with life while half-believing the propaganda and not upsetting themselves too much on one side, and equally tired people doing their best to rebel however they can on the other.
> If the billboards in Ivanovo are to be believed, Russia’s really going places. > > “Record harvest!” > > “More than 2000km of roads repaired in Ivanovo Region!” > > “Change for the Better!” > > In this town, a four-hour drive from Moscow, a giant banner glorifying Russia’s invasion of Ukraine covers the entire wall of an old cinema. With pictures of soldiers and a slogan: > > “To Victory!” > > These posters depict a country marching towards economic and military success. > > But there is one place in Ivanovo that paints a very different picture of today’s Russia. > > I’m standing outside it. There’s a poster here, too. Not of a Russian soldier, but a British novelist. George Orwell’s face stares down at passers-by. > > The sign above it reads The George Orwell Library. George Orwell library in Ivanovno The small library keeps books about totalitarianism and dystopian worlds > > Inside, the tiny library offers a selection of books on dystopian worlds and the dangers of totalitarianism. > > There are multiple copies of Orwell’s classic novel Nineteen Eighty-Four; the story in which Big Brother is always watching and the state has established near-total control over body and mind. > > “The situation now in Russia is similar to Nineteen Eighty-Four,” librarian Alexandra Karaseva tells me. “Total control by the government, the state and the security structures.” > > In Nineteen Eighty-Four, the Party manipulates people’s perception of reality, so that citizens of Oceania believe that "war is peace" and "ignorance is strength". > > Russia today has a similar feel about it. From morning until night, the state media here claims that Russia’s war in Ukraine is not an invasion, but a defensive operation; that Russian soldiers are not occupiers, but liberators; that the West is waging war on Russia, when, in reality, it was the Kremlin that ordered the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. > > “I’ve met people who are hooked on TV and believe that Russia isn’t at war with Ukraine, and that the West was always out to destroy Russia,” Alexandra says. > > “That’s like Nineteen Eighty-Four. But it’s also like Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451. In that story the hero’s wife is surrounded by walls that are essentially TV screens, talking heads telling her what to do and how to interpret the world.” > > Alexandra Karaseva thinks Orwell's novel is now the reality in Russia > > It was a local businessman, Dmitry Silin, who opened the library two years ago. > > A vocal critic of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, he wanted to create a space where Russians could “think for themselves, instead of watching TV”. > > Dmitry was later prosecuted for “discrediting the Russian armed forces”. He’d been accused of scrawling “No to war!” on a building. He denied the charge. He has since fled Russia and is wanted by police. > > Alexandra Karaseva gives me a tour of the library. It’s a treasure trove of literary titans from Franz Kafka to Fyodor Dostoevsky. There is non-fiction, too; histories of the Russian Revolution, of Stalin’s repressions, the fall of communism and of modern Russia’s failed attempts to build democracy. > > The books you can borrow here are not banned in Russia. But the subject matter is very sensitive. Any honest discussion of Russia’s past or present can bring problems. > > Although not banned, the contents of the books at the library can bring problems > > Alexandra believes in the power of the written word to bring change. That’s why she is determined the library stays open. > > “These books show our readers that the power of autocratic regimes is not forever,” Alexander explains. “That every system has its weak points and that everyone who understands the situation around them can preserve their freedom. Freedom of the brain can give freedom of life and of country.” > > “Most of my generation had no experience of grassroots democracy,” recalls Alexandra, who is 68. “We helped destroy the Soviet Union but failed to build democracy. We didn’t have the experience to know when to stand firm and say ‘You mustn’t do this.’ Perhaps if my generation had read Ninety Eighty-Four, it would have acted differently.” > > Eighteen-year-old Dmitry Shestopalov has read Ninety Eighty-Four. Now he volunteers at the library. > > “This place is sacrosanct,” Dmitry tells me. “For creative young people it’s a place they can come to find like-minded citizens and to get away from what’s happening in our country. It’s a little island of freedom in an unfree environment.” > > As islands go, it is, indeed, little. Alexandra Karaseva is the first to admit that the library has few visitors. > > By contrast, I find a large crowd in the centre of Ivanovo. It’s not Big Brother people have stopped to listen to. It’s a Big Band. > > In bright sunshine an orchestra is playing classic Soviet melodies and people start dancing to the music. Chatting to the crowd I realise that some Russians are more than willing to believe what the billboards are telling them, that Russia’s on the up. > > “I’m happy with the direction Russia’s heading in,” pensioner Vladimir tells me. “We’re becoming more independent. Less reliant on the West.” > > “We’re making progress,” says a young woman called Natalya. “As Vladimir Putin has said, a new stage for Russia has begun.” > > But what about Russia’s war in Ukraine? > > “I try not to watch anything about that any more,” Nina tells me. “It’s too upsetting.” > > Back at the George Orwell Library they’re holding an event. A local psychologist is finishing a lecture on how to overcome "learned helplessness" and believe you have the power to change your life. There are ten people in the audience. > > Pro-invasion propaganda is a fact of daily life in Russia now > > When the lecture ends, librarian Alexandra Karaseva breaks the news. > > “The building’s been put up for sale. Our library has to move out. We need to decide what to do. Where do we go from here?” > > The library’s been offered smaller premises across town. > > Almost immediately one woman offers her van to help with the move. Another member of the audience says she’ll donate a video projector to help the library. Others suggest ideas for raising money. > > This is civil society in action. Citizens coming together in time of need. > > Admittedly, the scale is tiny. And there’s no guarantee of success. In a society with less and less space for “little islands of freedom,” the library’s long-term future is uncertain. > > But they’re not giving up. Not yet.
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/c84dde15-43a1-4883-a7da-8629518d95a4.jpeg?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
Image with a text, an image is of a blue top, white bottom pill laying on a red background.
The top text reads: "This is a placebo meme".
The bottom text is: "Studies show placebo Memes are still reacted to even when users know they are a placebo"
It seems that the web UI treats spoilers without a space after :::
the same as the regular ones, while Thunder ignores those as spoilers. It looks like the closing spoiler marker may be entered without whitespace but it consumes extra text after the spoiler, and overall acts weird
I can create an issue if that's needed, or this post may be referenced in an existing issue to be used as a test
```
no whitespace
Content
whitespace present
Content
one-liner no whitespace
Content:::
one-liner whitespace present
Content:::
Extra text in the end
one-liner whitespace present
Content
Second extra text ```
produces
no whitespace
Content
whitespace present
Content
one-liner no whitespace
Content:::
one-liner whitespace present
Content:::
Extra text in the end
one-liner whitespace present
Content
Second extra text
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/26ba518f-a140-42e5-8961-d7e5079baf25.jpeg?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
It's going to be her first New Year 😅
We don't erect a new year tree but there was a storm that broke lots of branches off trees, so we used one of those to create a holiday air
I can't seem to find a definition for different kinds of icons Sync uses for special users, e.g. I know how OP and my account are denoted, I have seen bot accounts marked, also I guess that I have seen a mark where a user blocked me.
Is there a place where I can check what each pictogram means and what are the possible ones?