You must not have paid attention to the smite "pro" scene if you believe that game is in a good spot.
To be fair...
And fraud is not something youtubers is known for!
they have? And both wifi and UsB is still a mess to understand under the name.
They probably have to scale down the resources used for each query as they can't scale up their infrastructure to handle the load.
Do they count the times the human driver had to take control to avoid a crash?
VMWare has 38k? holy hell. I was surprised by slack having over 3k.
so you can buy a one time vip access? would 20 000 subtitles be worth $10? How many should you get for $10 to be worth it?
You'd never have these kind of massive creations though. You'd have a bunch of half good bigger projects, and some truly great simple movies.
My company switched to LP after the breach. it chief must have gotten a good deal!
With UBI everyone would get it and any salary from a job would be additional. So salaries would go down, but compensated by UBI
who's liable when it crashes? And it's "better" than human drivers in very limited situations with a human driver behind the wheel to take control.
So, as an engineer in the oil industry, should I be paid a % of all the sales in projects I've been a part of? These weiters are paid a salary for their work (I assume), a book author is usually not.
Most of the western world doesn't have to imagine
Yet the cost doesn't go down. Spacex boss defined reuse as that the stage can be reused the next day with just an inspection. The reuse they avtually so is rebuilding it with the older parts. At least last time I checked the cost savings were just a few 10 % while they promised 90+
Edit: did some more checking, and it appears third party(military and government) pay significantly higher launch costs ~100mill vs 60mill list price), so might be they're subsidising the starlink cost by funneling money from the state.
Young people in Korea have switched over to iphones. iphone have like 60% marketshare now for that demographic
Yes, but that's not because of reusability. They're not at that stage yet (willl they ever?)
Reusability has nothing to do with it. Hardly any of the rockets have been reusable (in terms of saving significant money on launches). It's just that spacex is dumping enormous amounts of satellites in LEO. It's going to become a huge problem when other companies/countries does the same.