There needs to be no separation on the ]( for the link to render properly: [text](link)

And while, yeah the wiki is empty, thanks for clearing this one out for the fedi.

at that point I start recycling them, and go back to parenthesis.

so when bp = 300x - 3, this:

4( 4[ 4{ 15bp + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000

would turn to

4( 4[ 4{ 15( 300x - 3) + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000

perhaps not the best, but I rather stick to conventional symbols rather than using... idk, question marks? that'd be funny as hell, though

just picture it:

4© 4« 4¿ 15bp + 10 ? - 375 » - 2250 🄯 - 15000

mind expanding on what these solve?

ELI5 how can i root my device?

may we get some pointers on what did you start with?

Don't use your funny words on me, magic one

The fact that I didn't notice the end of your post, and started mindlessly scrolling through the Related Posts is hilarious and sadly ironic.

isn't this a good change though?

Amazing: surprisingly simple, yet complex and fun! Also there's the added bonus that you get to vent, ha.

Awesome. I tried to stick to the developer's instance, but the captcha works too well.

Your recommendation is now my default, thanks! May you have a delightful meal.

comic by Nyazche

This is what made YouTube rabbit holes fun a few years ago. Now we're all in our own echo chambers.

how is the image related?

Alternatively, pressing 0 can be quite easy.

Thanks! Tired of removing the tracking "?si=" parameter from YT links

ETA: Fun clip, nonetheless. "Smoothness over clarity", huh.

Thanks! Failed like 7 times that IQ test with grainy pics, but the interface is good.

The fact that much of the project is discussed over Discord should be damning enough...

Don't you think is damning that someone's concern of privacy is handwaved because the data was "volunteered, not collected" ?

And, as a user, many of the AI features are limited at best and factually incorrect at worst. I would only salvage FastGPT and Quick Answer; they summarize the first 4 or 5 relevant links and contrasting views (even if it bases the whole search on a single Reddit comment from 2017).

Funnily enough the Universal Summarizer and Discuss Docs are the least reliable.

All in all, I am conflicted because it seemed like a pristine service and it's getting clouded with time.

For whatever it's worth, I'm on the same boat as you with the 1.5 smiles per smile: truly fantastic.

what is?

Using the first entry for steal on the English wiktionary:

To take illegally, or without the owner's permission, something owned by someone else without intending to return it.

So, if you can't actually own stuff, you can't (by definition) steal it.

I get your point, and this more of an ^AcKsHuALly type of argument, but it's an fun way of begging the question of what "I own this" means in today's society.