South Australia’s upper house narrowly rejects ‘Trumpian’ bill to wind back abortion care
South Australia’s upper house narrowly rejects ‘Trumpian’ bill to wind back abortion care
Legislation to force women seeking a later termination to be induced, deliver the baby alive, and keep it or adopt it out, defeated by 10 votes to nine
…legislation that would force women seeking an abortion after 27 weeks and six days – an extremely rare occurrence – to be induced, to deliver the child alive.
Emphasis mine.
That’s 10 weeks early. I’m far from an expert but that’s extremely premature, right? Like, that baby is going to be in a very precarious place for a significant amount of time, yeah?
Again, I’m far from an expert but that seems horrible for literally everyone involved, especially the child! Possibly leading to lifelong health and developmental issues.
[Ben Hood] has previously said that, once born, if the baby “isn’t compatible with life”, it would then be given palliative care.
Takes “born to die” to the extreme.
4Worse still that an MP came in form sick leave to vote against.
From what I read somone would abstain and shed be on leave, making the votes even out. Then they pulled out and said they'd vote so she came in to have her vote count!
4It's one of the worst feelings when you realise that social progress isn't guaranteed, and regressions happen frequently throughout history.
15Which is what this is about. The number of later term abortions is tiny, but this would get them a foot in the door & reopen debate.
2
Fucking hell SA
9Sounds like the SA Liberals are providing free campaign material for Labor to destroy them with in the next election. As if they even needed it, the Libs are a complete mess.
6
The one thing I hate about it country is its desire to copy America with everything. Even though we see how poorly it goes for them first.
9Our lizard people see how much money their lizard people are making torturing their peasants and want to get in on the action. That's why we have the push towards private health care.
2
I didn't think Australia would still be religious enough to have considered this. They're generally more liberal than the US.
1"Australia" didn't consider it. It was a conservative opposition party in one state that pushed the bill, and it was ultimately defeated.
1I don't have any numbers, but I suspect that there are more openly religious people in government compared to the general population. Which could simply be due to the average age of politicians being older.
And SA is known to be a pretty religious place historically compared to the rest of Australia.
1
The Liberal frontbencher Ben Hood, who introduced the bill, says the woman’s right to end a pregnancy is kept because the pregnancy ends when the baby is born. “The innovation of this bill is that it allows a mother to end her pregnancy throughout all nine months and indeed, right up to birth,” he says.
That's some mental gymnastics to come up with that logic. And unsurprisingly, from the supposed "moderate" branch of the Coalition.
14That cunt is an outright bastard and so is every fucker who voted with him
No one decides late term to just fucking abort. At that point it's overwhelmingly euthanasia. Forcing someone to carry a dead / hellishly suffering child to term is pure fucking evil.
And we need to start saying that very very fucking loudly every time this shit comes up. Because they've framing it as kittens and puppies and save the babbies when it's fucking none of these things
12
We need to start sending these cunts back to the Stone Age. Queensland could be first but they seem to be blinded by the fight against a racist bogey man that doesn’t exist “youth crime”
3It's not Queenslanders, it's decades of education to trust the media. Critical thinking is taught at school (only in History electives though) but seldom applied to politics. Abortion isn't the only thing we might lose to "youth crime", we'll lose democracy and clean energy
4
Here we fucking go :(
8