18 hr. ago • 96%

Google is Killing uBlock Origin. No Chromium Browser is Safe.

www.quippd.com Google is Killing uBlock Origin. No Chromium Browser is Safe.

We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the ...

40 comments

If the other main Chromium based browsers can figure out (or keep in the instance of having their own extension stores) how to support for V2 extensions. Then it would be easier to recommend replacing Chrome to normies and other folks with those options. As one of the main issues comes down to lots of sites (especially stuff like school or work) doing the modern version of IE and are coded to really only work with Chrome.

I was advising customers to just use Edge if they needed Chrome for those reasons. And a lot of them did since it meant not installing extra programs. Though it is currently hard to recommend Edge due to MS seeming to find more and more "features" to add that make shit really annoying and scummy. It is like they are trying so hard to make it not worth using at all. So Brave and Vivaldi are the new options I tell people about.

Brave's main downside (IMO) is the crypto stuff maybe confusing/pointless for folks. Vivaldi's main downside (and upside for users that love it) is how overwhelming levels of customization settings. But they both don't have their own extension stores. Opera could also work since they have their own extension store. I hate how it and the GX version love to automatically set themselves to launch on Windows startup (fuck all of them that try to do this as well).

1
My dad used to watch TV and I always wondered why given how shit it was, nothing but ads. He told me about how great it used to be when he was a kid. I can't help think the same thing is happening now with the internet. It's dying. It's already shit compared to 10 years ago and I only see it getting worse. Our generations will cling to it remembering what it used to be though, just like he did.

3
This article has some misinformation in places. Like it claims Vivaldi's ad-blocker cannot be investigated further because the project is closed source, but the only closed source part of Vivaldi is the UI (approximately 5% of the total code). The ad-blocker C++ code is published along with the other 95% of the browser's code.

8
- You don't think a tarball dump is harder to investigate than a CVS repository? I never claimed it was impossible to investigate further, just that it was harder to.
  
  Where is the misinformation?
  
  -1
  
  But that's not what you claimed. Direct quote from the article (bold emphasis is mine):
  
  Vivaldi users point out that the built in blocker is noticably worse than uBlock Origin, with some guessing that Vivaldi doesn’t fully support uBlock Origin filterlists (Vivaldi is closed source, so it’s harder for users to investigate).
  
  You clearly implied that the reason Vivaldi's source code regarding ad-blocking is harder for users to investigate is because it's closed source. This is not true.
  
  3
I finally switched to Firefox when I couldn't remove the ads on my casual browsing. Now I'm told Firefox isn't cash money either? Wtf is going on here.

3
uBlock may have enough support to start their own maintained fork, and be the upstream for all the other quiet browsers. That dude is like THE ONE GUY that makes chromium sane, and doesn't even take donations?!

11
WaterFox!

2
What pisses me off is seeing more and more "You need to upgrade your browser for this site!" when using Firefox.

Having to use a spoof header gets frustrating frequently too.

15
- I haven't seen such warnings for years anymore
  
  1
  
  Several of my utility companies and bank sites do this still. It's absurd and in the stranger places.
  
  1
- In my head I respond “you need to upgrade your website to handle my rad browser, fellas”
  
  7
I love how they gave a TL;DR right at the beginning of the article, it made me stay and read the rest out of respect for the author.

Google lives of the ads (among the things), of course a browser they develop is going to screw the add-ons that block ads. Solution: avoid google if you want an ad-free internet.

Edit: typo

26
You want free and private internet - Ok You don't want ads - Ok So who is going to give you something for free and why?

-34
- Ad block is the number one thing you can do on the Internet to reduce your risk to exploits, phishing, etc. The US government recommends the use of ad block specifically for this reason. Usage of ad block is basic internet security hygiene.
  
  6
- Funny as the internet was designed as being free.
  
  Maybe just educate yourself a little. In general, not just about that.
  
  19
- Ok So who is going to give you something for free and why?
  
  People who value the ability to do publish information, or engage in personal expression, for starters.
  
  9
- If you've got no purpose hosting a website, don't. We don't need you.
  
  4
- FOSS Communities:
  
  12
- I don't mind ads so much. What I don't want in invasive tracking and collection of every scrap of data they can to push ads on you. Give some dumb ads based on the damned contents of the page and I would be fine. But no, ads is basically a synonym for tracking these days.
  
  12
- I knew it will be downvoted, but you have to realize, nothing is free in this world kids, I don't like it too, but it is what it is.
  
  -19
  
  posted on social media developed for free using a standard specced out for free running on servers people are allowing you to use for free...
  
  Whether or not current models are sustainable is beside the point. Obviously they aren't, ad blockers weren't developed for shits and giggles but to stop increasingly intrusive practices.
  
  3
  
  You’re paying for the air you breathe? Lots of things are free. Capitalists who want you to pay for what you shouldn’t will try to convince you otherwise.
  
  2
  
  limp dick attitude is how we got here... good job champ
  
  disgusting bootlicking
  
  10
  
  Bro's paying for grep.
  
  14
  
  nothing is free
  
  Plenty of things can be and are free at the point of service/point of consumption/utilization.
  
  That's all they need to be. And there just has to be enough willpower to do that from enough people.
  
  6
  
  Ok boomer
  
  10
  
  This world is what ever we make it, and literally everything we need to live is free, from water to food to shelter. The earth literally just does all that.
  
  2
Brave: 😎

-21
- Brave is the offspring of "libertarian" (sociopathic authoritarian billionaire supporting JD Vance) Peter Thiel.
  
  https://marketrealist.com/p/who-owns-brave-browser/
  
  Thiel, among other things, founded palantir, facial recognition software used by police worldwide.
  
  https://www.palantir.com/platforms/
  
  He hates the western world. Hates democracy.
  
  https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/donald-trump-steve-bannon-peter-thiel-214490/
  
  Openly states his plans to destroy the economy and implement a crypto financial system.
  
  https://ncio.ca/briefings/person-who-caused-the-collapse-of-silicon-valley-bank-is-an-active-member-of-germanys-proxy-the-world-economic-forum/
  
  And, this is true, he's the current president of the bilderberg group.
  
  https://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/meetings/meeting-2024/participants-2024
  
  He is not your friend.
  
  He should never be trusted.
  
  Brave is not the private browser you think it is.
  
  By supporting brave you are supporting an authoritarian technocratic state.
  
  20
  
  Which lines of its libre software source code are malicous?
  
  -4
- Brave also uses chromium.
  
  4
- Which is chromium. The article is specifically talking about chromium based browsers and how you'll lose access too.
  
  17
- Before Brave better use https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium
  
  6

You've viewed 40 comments.