I'm not really a programmer but when I code something at work to make my job easier and I have to go before I finish it, I write a little comment for my future self to explain how I'm thinking at the moment, to help restore the flow.
Because my work tends to have me working on a wide variety of features, and thus operating on vastly different parts of the codebase, I make it a point to comment out every change I make complete with the ticket that requested the change, and what the intended effect of the change is.
Cue me returning to piece of code I made (after the inevitable bug has arisen) and me staring at my own code changes in bewilderment, wondering what past me really wanted to do. Hahaha!
I stg sometimes conversations with my coworkers will give me memento disease and I have to go on a hunt for clues I lefy myself to figure out what I was working on 5 mins ago.
I understand and think the intended content is good. but who would post this with such an obvious layout flaw? it used to be posts with terribly distracting grammar whose intent was relatively easy to decipher. lately it feels like even more basic and obvious rules are being lazily ignored and even shared.
The text might be automatically added with some script or AI, to perhaps fit different sizes or create items in a batch. Or someone was really lazy, or a combination.
Yeah, I've developed a habit of writing TODO-comments wherever there's still something unfinished. And well, I usually leave in a compile error to force me to continue exactly there.
I started using suspend on my dev laptop. I basically never close Neovim, and I write notes to myself about what the code does for the next time I open my laptop. I know that's what comments are for, but whatever