An exciting Emerging Topic review published in Brain Medicine unveils compelling evidence linking air pollution exposure during pregnancy and early childhood to increased autism spectrum disorder (ASD) risk. The analysis highlights how specific pollutants trigger multiple pathogenic mechanisms, pote...
The timing of exposure appears crucial, with heightened vulnerability during prenatal development and early childhood when critical neurodevelopmental processes occur.
The research suggests that individuals with genetic predisposition to ASD may be more vulnerable to the harmful effects of air pollution exposure
The implications extend beyond individual health to public policy. How might cities need to adapt their urban planning to protect vulnerable populations? What role could air quality monitoring play in prenatal care?
Actually I don't see why anything would be done to orevent development of autism, when not much was done for all the already known damage that actual urban development cause
... It really is a shame that they still make it seem that being autistic is a problem...
If they found that it increases your chances of being gay or something, I'm sure their language would be much more respectful (if they published it at all).
I mean being autistic is a problem, in the same way losing a leg is a problem. It's not something to make a fuss about and definitely not something to hate people for, but people with even high-functioning autism definitely struggle with many things, and when you get to low-functioning autism it's a straight up disability.
I feel like there needs to be more programs designed to get Autistic people in technical jobs. Obsession with a topic will quickly make you an expert. Get them in a position where the hard skills are assumed to be easy and the soft skills are the stuff to learn.
**This is fake, not peer reviewed and an attempt to sell a fake cure by a quack. **
If this gives off Andrew Wakefield vibes to you, you are not alone. The "journal" is a huge red flag since the homepage is full of blatantly AI generated images (see below). It appears to have published very little else and appears to have been set up by the second name on the paper and corresponding author, Haitham Amal.
Amal, looking at his LinkedIn, appears to have also recently been appointed to the position at Neuro-nos, a company that describes itself as developing a non-FDA medical cure for autism and dementia.
I'm absolutely not saying that it can't be the case, nor that reducing pollutants from cars (and making more of them) would benefit everyones health. Just in this case, it is a blatant scam that will likely end up subjecting autistic children to god knows what side effects so this guy and his friends can make more money.
Your image is racist in the sense that it follows racial stereotypes against Asians. Not all Asian people are brilliant scientists who have perfect records. It is very hard for nerodivergent Asians to get help.
How many cars, how much they are driven and how they are driven, depend on urban development.
Urban development -> cars -> pollution
If you want less cars going around, design your cities to allow and incentivize people not to use them. See recent developments in Paris as an example:
Industry also causes air pollution and plenty of it. It's more visually segregated in developed countries. But as an example, have you ever explored the Pakistani factory video genre on Youtube?
The article itself is absolute hot garbage. It does nothing to back its claims beyond a few citations and fancy words. This is a just "make my numbers go up" pub. Irresponsible waste of resources if it really was funded by a grant. Christ look at the levels of speculation and chains of if/then correlations blatantly apparent in the diagram on page 3 of the journal article.