My only argument against your opinion, is that he actually has a trackable history of poor performance as a CEO and a trackable record of very bad monetization schemes. He's the reason EA is the way it is.
This isn't the first company he's ruined the reputation of.
Granted, the board that elected him is still there. That's an issue that will persist for a while.
To that I would say, his track record is what makes him the perfect scapegoat. That might very well have been a consideration when bringing him on in the first place.
My only argument against your opinion, is that he actually has a trackable history of poor performance as a CEO and a trackable record of very bad monetization schemes.
...which could be because he has offered this service to many boards in the past.
Haha, o god, no. Bit a guy like him would probably not even for a second think about working for them even of they would give him 100% of the funding they receive now (50k?)
He heavily endorsed the bad decision made by Unity and his comments really didn't help the situation so this is a welcome decision. Of course this will likely not change Unity's direction.
@chloyster good, he's been a plague on the industry. When you see your customers as wallets with legs you are bad for the people and bad for the company.