That's just because the shutter speed is matching up exactly with the flapping of its wings, like a metal hummingbird.
136- 9
I needed that. Thank you :)
7
Your render distance might be set too low, either turn it up or approach closer to see that plane move properly.
32Yeah it looks like the plane was loaded, but its in the classic starfish pose as the animations haven't loaded yet. I recommend updating your driver, or at least directing him to a better airport.
7Try unplugging it from the airport and plugging it back in.
5
That's the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge, right?
12yeah this is definitely the approach path for SFO.
1
Probably because it's a fake airplane someone edited in there.
9No, it's because the camera moves around the plane with the right speed to keep it in the same spot as the background from the camera. You can still see that the plane moves, but it's subtle.
26The plane does cross the bridge.
3I agree. The plane is moving, but the camera's movement and the relative speeds of the two planes makes it harder to see. If you scrub quickly through the video it's easier to see it moving forwards and downwards.
2Feel free to believe what you want.
-14
Oh, do you have the original video without the plane?
9They forgot to add a shadow. Bridge casts a pretty strong shadow showing the sun almost straight up in the sky but nothing from the plane. I have seen smaller propeller planes balance out with wind speed but a jet would need quite the wind and the water is also not that stormy
3The sun is at an angle, check the bridge shadow again. It's almost 45° from the bridge position. Makes sense we can't see the plane shadow.
This is just parallax messing with our perspective. Scrub quickly and you'll see it's moving. It's slower since it's coming in for a landing at SFO.
1
Packet loss that terrible again?
6
