Trump’s indictment has turned every American voter into a juror
Trump’s indictment has turned every American voter into a juror
Then I vote for capital punishment.
29Y'all going to be real pissed off again.
25I'm gonna be pissed off having to vote for Biden. I hate the two party system.
25Dutchie here. Not a fan of the multiparty system either. Anyone who hits the news (be it positive or negative) can start their own party if they get the number of party members required.
Result: we had to enlarge our voting billets.
6
Why, you think he's going to win?
6It would be consistent with him getting away with all of the other obviously blatant shit he has done before.
3Don't know if @Dlg@lemmy.world is cheering for that (we'll know if they decided to comment on me not assuming their gender). I'm not hoping for it, but I'm not super positive they'll be proven wrong.
1
doubt
1👌
-2
That's certainly a way to look at it. Not wrong either.
16Pretty par for the economist. Not the same take as every other news outlet, not exactly the take I agree with on all points, but not totally wrong either.
8It kind of made me go "Hmmm" at first but it's a pretty weak analogy.
1
*swing state voters
15We also get to see how badly he loses the popular vote.
6Currently looks unlikely 😓
-6
Guilty.
7The main problem with that analogy is that juries hear all the evidence before making their decision.
But MAGA voters will never hear the facts on these cases, because they live exclusively in a media bubble that feeds them lies and truly moronic conspiracy theories.
This country is not okay.
7The main problem with that analogy is that juries hear all the evidence before making their decision.
No. They are SUPPOSED to hear all the evidence. Reality and expectation are different things.
Voters are supposed to hear all of the facts. But reality and expectation are different things.
The analogy works great.
2
Archive link: https://archive.ph/efBfM
7Article is paywalled after two paragraphs
4The Economist always has one eye on the bottom line.
7