Ubuntu or pop! os
Ubuntu or pop! os
I'm planning on moving to linux from windows(personal) and macos(work use), although I prefer mac os, so I don't really want to use mint, and I feel like I should add that I don't care if GNOME isn't that similar to macos, I want something different, and I also use my computer for gaming
PopOS for sure. Ubuntu hasn't been great lately.
25Why PopOS and why isn’t Ubuntu great lately? Did I miss something?
7https://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=3766
Look under Snap
18
Pop!OS anyday over ubuntu.
19Why have you narrowed it down to those two options, if I may ask? Between those two, I'd go for Pop_OS but if you are open for another suggestion, you may want to look at EndeavourOS, which is based on the same Linux distribution as SteamOS (since you said you also want to game).
16I don't think we should recommend any rolling release to beginners, I love Arch but that's just going to cause issues!
6Yeah, you're probably right. Haven't had any issues the last time I used Manjaro, though. But that's only anecdotal evidence at best.
2
+1 for EndeavourOS. Just installed it on an older notebook (ThinkPad X220) and damn, was it a breeze to set up properly.
6
Any distro is better than Ubuntu nowadays. I use pop os personally and it works flawlessly.
14I've been using Ubuntu for the past 6 years, haven't tried another distro because I'm so comfortable here. Could you tell me why you think others are so much better?
Maybe I should switch, but I think my experience in Ubuntu might outweigh the negatives that it has ie I might just know how to deal with it's peculiarities and I don't even realize
2If it works well for you, don't switch. Many Linux users are against Snaps, because Canonical "forces" them on you and they tend to take up more space. Ubuntu has become the Nickelback of Linux distros. Yes, it's not the best, but it's also not terrible and still a good beginner distro. Stick with what you like.
6
I'd say popos. It's very polished and they are both developers as well as hardware people. It works very well. For servers I'd go with Ubuntu, but not for desktops.
14I’ll be that guy - I still default to Ubuntu. The concerns about snap are valid but it’s still a rock solid OS. Every server I have has been running it for years, virtually no problems except during upgrades if I’m careless about config updates.
11I've use Ubuntu and a lot of other distros are based on Ubuntu. When I switched from Windows to Linux, I wanted to have the desktop look different from Windows. Some people want that familiar look of Windows. It's a matter of taste.
I tried PopOS, but it's Nvidia driver was behind what Ubuntu was running, so I went back to Ubuntu. But the Linux community hates Nvidia and Snap. I have an Nvidia card, and it plays my games and looks great. Snap doesn't bother me. BUT Linux is great in that there is so much choice with many distros. Try them and see which one you like.
1
PopOS is the best experience I have had with a distro for a while.
11this
5
POP!_OS all the way. They ship the latest kernel and also have their own COSMIC desktop workflow. If you want the latest software use flatpak or Guix/Nix instead.
7Pop_OS! is a greatly extended version of Ubuntu. It offers an unique 1 password encryption + login solution. I don't have Nvidia gpu but many people has claimed it offers the best Nvidia support out of the box.
7It does. Literaly worked out of the box whereas on windows i had to go through some really painfull process to make it work
0
Hannah Montana Linux is a nice cleaned up fork on Ubuntu with zero downsides. Your anti virus is also Hannah Montana so u can't get viruses.
5I moved from Ubuntu to Pop!_OS.
It feels miles ahead, it feels so clean and polished and looks great, flatpaks enabled instead of snap. Go Pop
4It's better than it used to be but for gaming a Debian base can still get in your way and if you don't mind the change in interface anyway it might be worth checking out Nobora. That's a gaming focused edition of Fedora by Glorious Eggroll, the creator of a really cool version of Valves Proton called ProtonGE and highly regarded in the community! It's basically Fedora with a few modifications and great defaults for gaming and only a Gnome version.
4There's also a KDE version of Nobara. I use it myself and it's been great so far.
3Cool, I didn't know about that one but I am a Gnome user so I can't say I ever really looked for another spin ether! :)
2
pop_OS is a de-crapified Ubuntu remix. It's not a stand-alone distribution. For most packages pop_OS is reliant on Canonical, including graphics drivers. So if you want to use it for gaming and have and AMD or Intel GPU and not an NVidia one, you'll have to stick to Ubuntu's outdated Mesa and kernel drivers. For gaming on AMD/Intel GPUs, something along the lines of EndeavourOS or Fedora should be a better choice. If you use a GeForce, pop_OS should be OK.
3So if you want to use it for gaming and have and AMD or Intel GPU and not an NVidia one, you'll have to stick to Ubuntu's outdated Mesa and kernel drivers.
This is not true. Pop OS packages its own kernel and often the kernel version provided by pop is upstream of the Ubuntu version. It is only recently that they have fallen behind ubuntu because they have diverted their resources to creating the Cosmic DE.
Edit : Also to be noted is the fact that being on the latest version of mesa is only necessary if you have very new hardware which may not be supported well(or at all) in the older versions of mesa. I for example have an RDNA1 gpu and saw no performance difference between mesa 22.5 on pop os and mesa 23.1 on endeavourOS. People using RDNA3 or Intel Arc may see massive performance/stability difference because these are very new hardware and drivers/optimisation for these current gen GPUs is ongoing
4
Pop os is always better than ubuntu
2What device are you intending to use, you mention you’re using macos so I’m guessing Apple hardware?
Just thought I’d share my experience with pop on my MacBook in case we can help each other 😂. Basically I was dead set on pop but couldn’t get it to install for the life of me - the installer showed my disk as being a fraction of the size it was, even exfat volumes created by the installer. So I had to shrink other os petitions like crazy so I could trick it into thinking there was enough space.
There was no option to encrypt the disk in the installer and it didn’t play nice when I created my own LUKS container.
After several hours of trying to beat it into submission I ended up using Ubuntu’s legacy installer and was up and running in 15 mins.
So yeah if you are using Apple hardware and get pop playing nice please share any tips :)
2I like Elementary OS more, it's very clean looks very good also.
2If you really want to run Linux on an ARM (aka Apple Silicon) device you need to use Asahi Linux.
1I have an intel device, not an ARM one.
Though I would love an M2!
1
I'm only using a MacBook for work, I will be using a computer that is intended to run windows
1
Debian with KDE. Or Manjaro.
2+1 For Pop OS - spend many days distro hoping and end up there :)
2I'd say any Ubuntu-based distro over Ubuntu itself.
Either Pop, or Linux Mint.
2How much RAM do you have? Ubuntu and Pop use Gnome and it's heavy on RAM. Linux Mint is light on RAM, for example, especially Mint MATE.
I'm sure there must be a way to install the latest drivers via backports. You'd have to research it.
116 gb currently but I may upgrade it when I replace my computer
1Ok that's plenty. Ubuntu uses about 1.6GB at cold boot. Pop should be similar. Mint uses about 745MB at cold boot. Mint MATE about 500MB.
It's really up to you. They all have an ubuntu base so just decide which desktop environment you like.
1
Fedora
0