Warner Bros joins Disney in suing Sling TV for making streaming video cheaper and more convenient
Warner Bros joins Disney in suing Sling TV for making streaming video cheaper and more convenient
Warner Bros Joins Disney In Suing Sling TV For Making Streaming Video Cheaper And More Convenient
Earlier this month we noted how Disney and ESPN had sued Sling TV for the cardinal sin of actually trying to innovate. Sling TV’s offense: releasing new, more convenient day, weekend, or week-long shorter term streaming subscriptions that provided an affordable way to watch live television.
These mini-subscriptions, starting at around $5, have already proven to be pretty popular. But, of course, it challenges the traditional cable TV model of getting folks locked into recurring (and expensive) monthly subscriptions. Subscriptions that often mandate that you include sports programming many people simply don’t want to pay for.
So of course Time Warner has now filed a second lawsuit (sealed, 1:25-mc-00381) accusing Dish Network of breach of contract. In the complaint, Warner Bros lawyer David Yohai argues that this kind of convenience simply cannot be allowed.
That’s hilarious. Sling has been around for a decade… and now they care.
You can tell traditional television is dying. An industry that isn’t struggling doesn’t consistently embarrass itself like this.
It reminds me of the major labels in the music industry, pissing their pants for ten years when iTunes and streaming became popular.
The "unofficial" streaming sites are better than the official ones at this point. A decent VPN costs less per month than any subscription to an official industry service.
How are the “unofficial” streaming sites financed if people only pay for VPN?