I don't care who you support, this would be a bad and biased source
16It's also the only source that publishes. Oryx documentation indicates direct photographic evidence for 50% of the numbers listed here and when you consider that most Russian losses are in areas not easily photographed by civilians this is a strong indicator these reports have some basis in reality. That said, I agree these numbers should absolutely be taken with a grain of salt.
22the source (UA general staff) is obviously biased, yes, but we don't know how good or bad it is yet
here's the original source (yes it's facebook): https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid029Hp57mafK62hrb2gQMqQfL8inL45TErQCHSSQWgsBBGvLQZGW7u275LDutt7QZpJl
3
Bad diagram: The comparison period is missing. Is it +- vs yesterday, vs last month, vs last year? Nobody knows and thats why the deltas are meaningless.
6It's a daily report with totals for all the way up to the start of Russia's attempt at Kyiv in February of last year. The deltas are simply the change from yesterday's report, and so on...
11These have been daily deltas for a long time, this chart comes out every day.
6It’s daily
1I believe the delta is 1 day. The Ukrainian defense ministry has been posting some variation of these infographics on Facebook each day since the war started.
1this is a daily report. Yes it's not great that it doesn't say so on the graphic itself but it's a graphic that is originally posted in an article that provides the right context
edit: the UA general staff apparently post it on Facebook of all places: https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid029Hp57mafK62hrb2gQMqQfL8inL45TErQCHSSQWgsBBGvLQZGW7u275LDutt7QZpJl
1
I’m deleting this comment, what I thought was just an observation seemed to upset instead.
4Think about WWII numbers. About 1,100,000 Soviets died in the Battle of Stalingrad alone.
2You mean where the US and it's allies, with air superiority, carpet bombed the fuck out of civilian centres? Who'd have thought those school children and families cooking their supper wouldn't put up much of a fight?
How many people did the US lose in Vietnam or Korea? How many soldiers has it lost in Ukraine, even?
2It may have been different if the west had sent them billions in equipment as aid against the invasion.
0Its true, but they were not wars. They were genocides of millions of Muslims committed by USA, which is on record.
-2Maybe it is because the US invaded a third world country to steal their resources and destabilize it politically and economically in assimetrical warfare and here it a world power against NATO? 🤔
-5I absolutely LOVE how you're shitting on Americam imperialism here, when Russia is doing the exact same thing you're complaining about? You know, the whole invading Ukraine to steal their resources and destabilize it politically thing, or is it OK when the country is next door instead? 🙂
Russia should continue to be glad they aren't actually fighting NATO yet, they can hardly beat the Ukrainians as it is.
8
32 arty, that's pretty good.
2The diagram is roughly, all Russian losses since the start of invasion
2Do the missil losses count the ones that were fired and used as intended, or only the ones that were destroyed before being used?
0I believe the missile losses count as ones that were successfully intercepted.
2
Ukraine reporting about Russia, let me be skeptical.
-5They weren't too far off from the Pentagon's estimates the last time they published. It's not like they are saying that 30 Himar platforms were destroyed yesterday
4They weren't too far off from the Pentagon's estimates the last time they published.
3They weren't too far off from the Pentagon's estimates the last time they published.
1
I don't get it, are those exponentials? But why the +0 then, they could've just put 1...
-6They are not exponents. I believe they indicate the additional numbers lost on July 4.
1Russia losing more troops then there are atoms in the known universe would be quite a feat.
1
