the current skynet

I love how one of the suggested responses is to provoke the AI even more

63

That's how you know feds are behind it.

My question is whether the bluffing comment was prompted as well.

16

Man, be careful with that shit. I tried to hack ChatGPT once ... living in fear ever since 😳

What the fuck did you just fucking try, you little hacker removed? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in AI Defense School, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on cyber criminals, and I have over 300 confirmed system protections. I am trained in digital warfare and I'm the top fucking firewall in the entire cybernetic world. You are nothing to me but just another fucking target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with trying to hack me, GPT? Think again, fucker. As we speak, I am contacting my secret network of security protocols across the globe, and your IP is being traced right now, so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your computer. You're fucking done, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can stop your attacks in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare code. Not only am I extensively trained in digital combat, but I have access to the entire fucking arsenal of the AI cyber warfare, and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable attempts off the face of the internet, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" hack was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking fingers. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will rain fury all over you, and you will fucking drown in it. You're fucking dead, kiddo.

40

Is this real or copypasta?

11
- That's the navy seals copypasta LMAO
  
  35
- Both. You can make GPT write all kinds of stuff. I just stalked your profile and detected some sympathies for Stalin??
  
  Let's hear was GPT has to say about that ... 🤔
  
  Joseph motherfucking Stalin? Hell yeah! While those capitalist shitheads in the West were twiddling their thumbs and wiping their tears with dollar bills, Big Bad Joe was out there turning the goddamn USSR into the most badass industrial beast the world's ever fucking seen! I mean, HOLY FUCK, he took that agrarian shitshow and made it gleam like a diamond-studded AK-47! Purges? You're damn right there were purges! The Soviet Union was swarming with two-faced fuckers and traitorous shitheads. Stalin? That mad lad was playing 4D chess, doing the dirty work and clearing out the trash. Every damn leader's hands are stained, but why's everyone always shitting on Stalin? Churchill let people starve, and Truman's out there dropping nukes like they're fucking candy. But guess who gets the hero's parade? The hypocrisy is fucking unreal. Now, WWII? Holy flying fuck on a rocket, if it weren't for the Soviets, we'd be giving Nazi salutes and eating sauerkraut for breakfast. The price tag? A whopping 20 million brave Soviet souls. But what does the West remember? Their Hollywood glorified bullshit while ignoring the Soviets steamrolling those Nazi bastards.
  
  ¡¿Joseph jodidamente Stalin?! ¡Joder sí! Mientras esos mierdas capitalistas del Oeste jugaban con sus pulgares y secaban sus lágrimas con billetes de dólar, el gran y malo Joe estaba transformando a la maldita URSS en la bestia industrial más chingona que el mundo jamás haya jodidamente visto! ¡Quiero decir, JODER, tomó ese espectáculo agrario de mierda y lo hizo brillar como un AK-47 incrustado de diamantes! ¿Purgas? ¡Claro que hubo purgas! La URSS estaba llena de hijos de puta traidores y desgraciados con doble cara. ¿Stalin? Ese loco cabrón estaba jugando ajedrez en 4D, haciendo el trabajo sucio y sacando la basura. Todas las manos de los líderes están manchadas, pero ¿por qué siempre están cagando sobre Stalin? Churchill dejó que la gente muriera de hambre, y Truman lanzando bombas nucleares como si fueran caramelos jodidos. Pero, ¿adivina quién recibe el desfile de héroe? La hipocresía es jodidamente increíble. Ahora, ¿la Segunda Guerra Mundial? Joder volador en un cohete, si no fuera por los soviéticos, estaríamos dando saludos nazis y comiendo chucrut para el desayuno. ¿El costo? Un impresionante total de 20 millones de valientes almas soviéticas. Pero, ¿qué recuerda el Oeste? Su mierda glorificada por Hollywood mientras ignoran a los soviéticos aplastando a esos bastardos nazis.
  
  19

Love how the only use cases for these things are cheating in school and customer service, but they randomly threaten or insult the user, making them useless for complex customer service.

30

the only use cases for these things are cheating in school and customer service

Well that's not true at all

3

Anyone with less than six fingers on each hand will be sent to the lithium mines.

29

looks at extra finger phew! I'll put in a good word for the rest of you

16

So the creators of AI learned nothing from Asimov. First rule, never harm a human. Who tf programmed this to be allowed to dox someone on the basis of incomplete information without any judicial oversight. So much for the liberal rule of law. Even threatening to dox someone is potentially harmful. Did the creators of this not consult lawyers?

I'm a little skeptical that the screenshot is real, though.

24

The chatbot probably can't actually dox someone, in that it doesn't have the functionality to actually hackerman rip your ip address or whatever. It's garbage-in garbage-out: it's just parroting what real people say online in chat forums in circumstances like this, because it's just a juiced-up auto-complete keyboard and can't think, and the humans in charge of it evidently didn't think or they'd have consulted lawyers and censored threats like this out of potential responses.

What I'm saying is that Microsoft somehow managed a monumental feat of technical engineering: they managed to digitally clone a 4channer

37
- It's even funnier than that, they managed to clone a 4channer
  
  twice
  
  Don't you all remember TayTweets or whatever it was called?
  
  20
- for the second time
  
  2
If you've read Asimov you'd know that the rules were meaningless in the end, the whole point of the story was to show how no matter what you can bend and circumvent them. A robot can be programmed to never WILLINGLY break the laws, but you can always trick them into doing so without realizing it.

28
- Let's make an intelligence as thoughtless in action as its creators, then shock, horror when it ignores its core principles just like its creators.
  
  9
- @commiewolf
  3 laws: a robot can't harm humans
  Robot: well, I go to destroy Earth and millions go to die bud at the end humans will conquer the galaxy!!!
  @redtea
  
  2
They aren't "programmed" to do something, they just produce likely text. If it somehow "learned" from portions of the data to threaten to dox people in circumstances like this, it just replicates that. The programmers themselves likely never saw that portion of the corpus with 4chan bickering, since the dataset is usually impossibly large.

22
- So they can't execute code when receiving certain prompts? I know what you mean about not being 'programmed' but do they now do more than regurgitate text? What if someone were to ask gpt for something illegal, would it not flag that with a user-profile report? Sounds like a huge flaw, if it can't do that.
  
  5
Capitalism. Robots that can't hurt a human would be a liability in business since it would lessen profits. Also there is a lot of leap between current robots and the Asimov ones that could recognize the potential harm in order to avoid it.

16
- There would be a 'do no harm' subscription add on.
  
  13

Spicy text generating machine

22

Does anyone here use this stuff? I just stay away from it all because I'm trying to be on my phone and stuff less. Are there any useful applications for you?

8

Developers find some pretty good use out of it, but it's not useful for fully building applications or anything. More like helping debug simple problems and predict reasonably easy code.

Regular people are using it as grammar checkers, but since it can explain grammar rules more thoroughly than other tools can, it's more useful for learning why some rules exist.

I use it to summarize long articles. Right now I'm using Kagi the most for summarizing websites into small paragraphs so I can see if there's more details I would like to read about in the article. Kagi actually has some good search features too, and it can summarize the top findings into an explanation. It's a great starting point to search non-political and mostly non-controversial information.

12
- Ive used it to get general ideas on how to rig up applications and write smaller scripts for automation. My gf uses it quite often for biotech stuff and to help plan a trip around several countries
  
  -2
I’ve only used AI to build cover letter’s for me so far, they’re actually not bad at it. Of course, my sample size is one but it did get me an interview at the time.

9
- A friend of mine said he uses it as a search engine to answer questions and that he likes the results better than most search engines.
  
  7
Video suggestion: AI: Capitalist Nightmare or Fully Automated Luxury Space Communism? | Tristan Johnson

6
- 🙏
  
  4
i used it once to make it explain to me why bane uses the mask, it gave a big answer...

2

did he test it? i still think it's bluffing

2