Haier, the air conditioner maker, takes down open source third-party Home Assistant integration
Haier, the air conditioner maker, takes down open source third-party Home Assistant integration
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10882099
Thankfully I don't use any of their products, but this really pisses me off. They claim that this open source project "causes significant economic harm to their company"
This is ridiculous. It is truly ridiculous. How can something that enables the user to efficiently control their AC cause "significant economic harm"???
Consider forking the repository or mirroring it to another platform like GitLab, Codeberg or your self-hosted Git server, so the project can continue to exist and someone can maybe fork it and maintain it.
The effected repos are: https://github.com/Andre0512/hOn and https://github.com/Andre0512/pyhOn
If you don't know about Home Assistant, check it out. It's an amazing piece of open-source software, that you can run at home on your own server and use it to control your smart home devices. That way, you don't need to connect them to the manufacturer's (probably insecure) cloud. It gives you sovereignty over your smart home instead of some proprietary vendor-locked garbage. Check out their website and the Lemmy community: !homeassistant@lemmy.world
I also highly recommend Louis Rossmann's video about this: https://youtu.be/RcSnd3cyti0
He makes awesome videos in general, consider subscribing.
As Rossmann said, don't ever buy anything from such a shitty company that doesn't respect their customers. This move by Haier is nothing other than a slap in the face for everyone, who just wants to comfortably control the product they paid for. This company is actively hostile towards their paying customers. Fuck these bastards!
The developer commented the following:
Luckily I'm insured. I've contacted my legal expenses insurance and they're covering a lawyer for the case. I will seek advice and see how an expert assesses the situation and then proceed.
Tldr, They are going to fight this!
Source: https://github.com/Andre0512/hon/issues/147#issuecomment-1892738060
129What sort of insurance is that and do I need to get some?
23Not sure if it's really the freelance/professional thing others mentioned. Private legal expense insurance (Rechtsschutzversicherung) is fairly common in Germany, so might just be that.
12Most home insurers in Western Europe provide with the coverage additional legal counsel / coverage in case someone claims we are liable for anything non motor related. And house insurance itself costs just a couple hundreds a year.
5Most professions where action/inaction can result in damages will have similar insurance. Some insurance firms even specialize in coverage for professionals.
If your profession has an association or similar group, they should be able to help you find those firms if they exist.
4my job has one for about ten bucks a month for employees. covers any need. estate planning, divorce, whatever.
4
My guess is someone saw what was being built and said "hey, we can build something similar and sell it", hence the C&D.
69Still a ridiculous move. If I buy an appliance, I pay for it and I own it. I am allowed to do with it whatever I want. If I want to use my own solution for controlling it, hosted on my own server, I should have every right to do so. Fuck corporations and their shitty cloud solutions.
57To be clear, I think the company are idiotic in the way they handled this, but I guess the integration probably hooked into the company's cloud-based services - so their servers.
13
The Apple iOS method. See a great app or product on your platform. If they won't sell it or want to much Apple just makes their own version and prohibits the original.
23This is actually a thing and is called Sherlocking: https://thehustle.co/sherlocking-explained/
15
Except instead of something similar, it's always something way, way worse.
12The EU really needs to start doing something about this kind of shit.
7The US does too, but fat chance of that happening.
4
When asked for a statement, the company answered "Yes we're idiots, and wanted everyone to know"
52@SharkAttak @Dehydrated way to ensure all internet searches on your brand deliver a "not compatible with stuff" impression to all prospective customers.
20I almost certain you’re being sarcastic, but please tell me I’m wrong. If that quote is actually true, that would be fucking hilarious!
1I extrapolated and condensed based on the company actions.
2
Better yet, make an example out of Haier. Prove to companies everywhere that allowing open source compatibility can only be good for them.
44Let's prove to companies that hostility towards open source can be really bad for them
32I literally buy based off Home Assistant support. If it needs to be smart and it's not supported by home assistant it's not coming in the house.
13
I was planning to replace a lot of my white goods this year.
This move has 100% eliminated Haier from any of my decisions.36Make sure to check all of Haier’s subsidies. GE is one of them.
17
That's the same company that has this on their 'about us' page:
"Haier company history: since its creation in 1984, the company has been run by the same CEO, Zhang Ruimin, who has always had a clear objective: to build high-quality, reliable products. Within the first year of his appointment, in response to complaints about faulty fridges, his radical action of smashing the fridges with a hammer in front of employees has been recognised as an important cornerstone of the brand."
I call hypocrisy!
30GitHub also has a legal defense fund for developers. GitHub lists it on their DMCA takedown page.
When GitHub processes a DMCA takedown under our circumvention technology claim review process, we will offer the repository owner a referral to receive independent legal consultation through GitHub’s Developer Defense Fund at no cost to them.
They created this fund after claims were made against a YouTube downloader from a third party. (not Google)
I don’t know if this would be an anti-circumvention claim, but it doesn’t sound like a bad idea to ask.
25How long until they start banning you from using thermostats made by other companies
24I'd like to thank Haier for their transparency. ♥️
23Don’t discount the economic loss they experience from not being able to harvest and sell your data (even possible in the EU, though harder of course)
17Well that's even worse and it's the reason we need local, self-hosted open source alternatives like Home Assistant.
5Hard agree
2
I sent them a nasty gram from their contacts page. I don't own anything from them right now but you can damn well bet I will avoid them if when/if it comes up.
I pointed them to Louis' video also
I assume a zero chance of any purchases is a larger economic hit than allowing a small diy community to interact with their PURCHASED and OWNED product.
13I didn't go nasty, but did do my bit to point out how short sighted this move was:
I just wanted to say that your silly take down notice on the Home Assistant developer, who was enabling greater satisfaction for customers who bought your products, was a perfect example of the Streisand effect in action: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
Thanks to you, I (who didn't own - and now probably never will - any of your products), am not only aware of your silly, unethical, and pointless behaviour, but have now taken steps to preserve the developer's code for future use.
You could've fostered this innovation, and gained yourselves the admiration of global, active and thriving community of like-minded people. And potentially gained more paying customers in the process.
Instead, you have achieved the opposite. Well done.
It won't make a lick of difference, but hopefully they get the same sentiment enough times that they at least understand what a fuck-up this was, on their part.
Edit: at least I know they got it
14I've just done the same thing, said I don't own any of their products but I certainly won't be buying them in the future and I will be actively discouraging people from buying their products, which will actually hurt their profits, and also put a snide little PS at the bottom saying "Good luck issuing cease and desist notices to the hundreds of forks of the software (803 so far according to another post) which will cost you real money instead of the made up MILLIONS OF DOLLARS that you claim this is open source software is costing you. It's companies like you that make buying consumer electronics a quagmire
4
I am in no way defending their behavior, but API calls will always incur some cost - either in backend resource consumption with "paying" customers, or legitimate costs if they're relying on AWS infrastructure.
However, like the whole reddit debacle, API usage isn't always well optimized at the client end, and it can become a negotiation rather than a C&D....unless you're looking to make a competitor as well.
11A few thoughts come to mind... 1) Some of their customers may only be customers because of HA compatibility. 2) HA does not require a cloud API to function - a LAN based solution is usually preferred anyway. 3) There are far more diplomatic ways to approach this issue.
17-
To think, from a business perspective, that any notable portion of their userbase bought the devices with the explicit expectation that it would work with HA would be naive. We're hobbyists, a niche market, the less-than-1% of their market evaluations. Losing those customers while reducing whatever burden or cost they're incurring is probably worth it.
-
HA doesn't - but while I don't have any Haier equipment to say, the other smart devices in my house which aren't either esphome or tasmota don't connect locally to my devices, but to the vendor cloud API. Ecobee, Wyze, Traeger all do that instead.
-
Totally agreed. I think AWS API costs are a few cents to the thousand, so a discussion with the developer about the use would be the nice way instead of just kowtowing to the bean counters.
6-
Any idea what the consequence is if the author instead transferred ownership entirely to an owner based in a country that would give no fucks about a lawsuit? Sure, the OG owner loses the project but would he avoid culpability?
8Anyone that wants to take the legal heat can just fork the projects and continue hosting it. I don't blame the original developer for not wanting to deal with it, even if the legal threat sounds very ridiculous (a project like this would be the opposite of financial harm, how many of us check if something works with home assistant before buying a device?).
8Kinda like how VLC is based out of France because there's no software patents?
5Software cannot be patented anywhere. What is patented are the algorithm. In France algorithm are considered maths and cannot be patented.
1
Is there a list of these takedowns? I know Mazda NA is another company that has killed a HA integration.
7I haven't seen such a list. But GitHub maintains a repo at https://github.com/github/dmca with all the DMCA notices they receive. And also, fuck Mazda as well for taking down innocent FOSS projects. Simply for this reason, I'm never buying any of their cars. There are enough other car makers on the market.
4
Alright. Let's get the ratgdo guy on this. I'd pre-order a rathvac today.
4This is sad to see. I have a hOn device which I recently connected to WiFi to see what features it would have. Sadly it had to connect to the internet to work so I didn't play with it too much. I checked this plug-in out then and was hoping I could use it.
3You probably can still use it. Just don't ever update the appliance because they will probably do something to break to api on purpose.
5
Looking at their twitter this is haier Europe and haier US doesn’t block home assistant at all. I assume these repos are specific to haier Europe though.
1They share a brand for mutual benefit. As far as I'm concerned, they can take the Electrolux and pyrex route and share the mutual pain of the other side being overly capitalist.
Haier & GE in the US can rebrand if they don't like the attention.
I'm trying to remember which company it was that sued their foreign trademark licensee because the partner chose to use inferior parts. The argument they used was that the partner damaged the global brand. It might not be relevant if the licensor is the one that's messing up here.
1
Don't subscribe to Rossman, mans lost his mind and just bitches, bitch bitch bitch.
-22That's what he has always done though?
"Bitching" is not inherently negative, though it is the most aggressive word I can think to mute criticism.
His job is tech criticism and info shares.
Frame it as bitching if you like, but your bias is showing.
Translation of your comment, "I don't like _ and others shouldn't either."
Nah, we good. I like em.
2I liked him for awhile, it was informative stuff. But the last year or so it's just complaining all the time. Not just about how companies treat us, but just everything. I just don't need all that negative energy, so I unsubbed. It's not really anything that everyone else isnt reviewing already anyway. You won't miss anything.
1