Elon Musk admits X ‘may fail’ after glitch deletes Twitter photos
Elon Musk admits X ‘may fail’ after glitch deletes Twitter photos
Platform’s users voice concern as it removes pictures and links on posts made before December 2014
"Over the weekend, a glitch on the platform meant that the site removed pictures and links on posts made before December 2014. The posts showed broken links instead of the pictures and videos that were previously there.
Several users noticed the glitch, with the technologist Tom Coates among those pointing it out. Coates referred to the glitch as “epic vandalism by Musk” and suggested it could be a cost-saving exercise."
Take a somewhat successful company, pay way more than it's worth and then run it into the ground through kack-handed incompetence fueled by unlimited arrogance. Only a true business genius could do that.
64There's idiots at my office that think this is all still some part of an elaborate plan of his.
17At best, I think it could be an actual plan of his, he was pissed when he was forced to buy Twitter after backing out, real pissed.
Maybe now he's intentionally destroying it as a way to destroy the accomplishments of those he was forced to buy it from, but he's doing it in a way that won't land him in legal trouble for intentionally destroying it.
I would believe it if it turned out to be true, but at the same time, he could simply be an extremely incompetent, super ultra mega wealthy idiot. I dunno.
8Could just be a shit plan
1
Another lemmer commented on a similar post and got me thinking... Who paid for Twitter, really? It was not all Musk. I have to wonder if he got marching orders from those bankrolling him to run it into the ground. Also what got deleted? Arab Spring.
Edited for link and more better words
13Out of 46.5 billion total cost, 27 billion was out of Musk's pocket. 13 billion were bank loans, most as a leveraged buyout so technically Twitter owes the banks, but the banks do not own shares. 5.2 billion, only a little more than 10% came from other sources. The biggest is 1.89 billion from the Saudi Prince, but those are just his previously owned shares that he decided to keep. It wasn't a new investment. He obviously has influence (same as he did before the acquisition) but I doubt he's giving marching orders with less than 5% stake. https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/who-is-financing-elon-musk-s-us-44-billion-deal-to-buy-twitter-1.6100579?
10
It's like someone who feels like there are some communication issues with their spouse go to marriage counseling and it somehow ends up with their house blown up. There was some struggle, but somehow the help turned it into a mess of an entirely different scale.
2Talking a traffic ticket down to Murder 1
3
Stripping for assets and declaring bankruptcy incoming
2They've already sold all their assets.
3Not many assets to strip.
2
He must be incredibly shocked that nothing else he’s tried has caused it’s complete collapse yet. I guess just deleting it is all that is left.
20Anything to distract from the fact that the $13bn debt the purchase entailed is what actually killed the business.
6
"Glitch"
Aka saving on server costs..
13Good. If you're still on Twitter, you're part of the problem.
12What in the fuck is a technologist? Is that what journalists are calling themselves now because they realized how embarrassing the journalist title has become?
9as if destruction wasn't his entire goal.. assuming he did this to make money is silly..
2At this point I'm thinking destroying twitter is just a scheme to write off losses so he can sell more TLSA stock and avoid taxes.
1i think it's more about fun.. there weren't many other toys he could buy and have this much fun with.. and he's just a nasty kid who likes to destroy other people's nice things..
3