China to ICJ: Palestine has ‘inalienable right’ to armed resistance
China to ICJ: Palestine has ‘inalienable right’ to armed resistance
China tells ICJ: Palestinian ‘use of force to resist oppression is an inalienable right’
A notorious, convicted terrorist said Palestine should resist by any means necessary.
That was Nelson Mandela
100The ANC didn't liberate South Africa with a cute hunger strike in prison.
44
Isn't it weird that I can't find any western media outlets reporting this? Super weird right, I just can't figure out why.
95Democracy Now has a good segment on it
31I wouldn't say any, but I did find two UK-based.
I'm just wondering if this is really a priority to report on its own.
23It's the second most powerful and influential nation in the world saying the Palestinian armed resistance is completely valid.
Yes it's a priority report.
46
It's almost like there's some sort of worldwide conspiracy to provide complete support for a Jewsish state no matter the cost, completely ignoring riots and public opinion and the lie that is democracy.
Hey, would you like to vote for Biden so he can support Israel or for Trump so he can take his turn in supporting it.
It's like the election system - that is flawed to only allow 2 parties - is made like it is so someone can control exactly who has the ability to get elected.
Zionism is conveniently almost the only thing the 2 parties can agree on, completely disregarding EXTREMELY OBVIOUS violations of everything you could think of, regularly committed by Israel.
Laugh at me for promoting "Jews control the world through the US" all you want but do you have other logical explanations?
Edit: for future readers, I meant Zionist Jews. This took too long to get edited because of a soft-ban.
-18You're equating Jews with Israel, so you're basically on the same moral level as Israel and deserve just as much respect. So, fuck you.
18Zionists control the West, not Jews.
18Zionism is merely a tool for colonialism and imperialism that weaponizes and exacerbates antisemitism, not the other way around like you're saying.
Colonialism itself is nothing new or exclusive to zionism.
8Ew what the fuck is your life
2
cannot be equated with terrorism
The only terrorists here are the "israeli" militants.
54Permanently Deleted
1
BREAKING: HAMAS OFFICIAL STATEMENT
We appreciate the position expressed by the People's Republic of China, during the public hearings held by the International Court of Justice, on the legal consequences of the occupation policies in the Palestinian Territory, and its affirmation of the legality of the occupied peoples' pursuit of self-determination, by various means, including armed resistance, and the necessity not to confuse terrorism with And the armed struggle practiced by the Palestinian people against the Zionist occupation.
We also value the positions of the countries participating in the sessions, which confirmed the widespread violations of international law practiced by the terrorist occupation entity against the Palestinian people and their occupied land, including massacres and genocide in the Gaza Strip, violations, killing, and expansion of settlement in the West Bank and Jerusalem, and work to bring about demographic changes in the Palestinian land. It aims to Judaize her and tamper with her identity.
The terrorist occupation government’s boycott of the court sessions confirms once again its disregard for international institutions, and its policy of turning its back on international resolutions and commitments, which requires a clear position from the international community to end the rogue Zionist occupation, and to stop all its violations and crimes against our Palestinian people.
24I thought China was on team Israel. Or maybe I'm confused because they're helping Russia, and Russia is on team Israel? International politics is weird sometimes.
5Russia joined Iran last season when Iran started helping them in Ukraine, so they're def. Team Hamas.
13For decades China's policy has been team territorial integrity (ie borders were set in 1948, and people shouldn't talk about them). Previously this meant supporting the 1967 borders. Their current position is still consistent with this (Israel still occupies the west bank), and has the added bonus of improving relations in the region which China has already invested a good deal in (see belt and road initiative)
Honestly this is one of the more straightforward cases of geopolitics, shit like the Nigerian Civil war however...
11Who told you that? The only one who is still on Israel's side is the US
9
Reeeeaaaallly now? Maybe we should let the Uyghurs know. Or those in Hong Kong. Or Tibet.
Winnie Pooh is tripping
0True.
The Uyghurs have a right to armed resistance too.
-2No...ONLY the Palestinians
-12
I was wondering why so many comments with any criticism against China were being downvoted.
Then I noticed which instance this was posted on.
And then all those comments were removed by mods. Which only proved their points.
-6Welcome to Lemmy. It's not quite as full of imperial core propaganda about everything that challenges its imperialism as Reddit is.
Well, maybe except LW. Saw someone with a zionazi flag in their username there once.
7This place is filled with crazy people. You will go mad if you start arguing with them.
1
Interesting take as far as China is concerned, not that I disagree. I wonder how their arguments for Palestine don't conflict with their stance on Taiwan or even Tibet, or their current actions against the Uyghurlar. I suppose it's more geopolitical posturing against "the West" more than an actual statement of ideology, but there might be nuance.
-9The problem with your comparison with Taiwan is Taiwan is an island that is part of China but is currently controlled by an occupying force. This is agreed upon by almost all nations except for 12, the US also agrees on this btw.
What the west is saying is that regardless of this, China does not have the right to an armed resistance against Taiwan even though they consider it part of China. They even agreed to arm Taiwan to prevent this attack from happening.
So in terms of their statement on Palestine, this is actually consistent. The Palestinians have a right to kick out their occupiers, much like China has the right to kick out Taiwan's occupiers.
You view it differently, but as I stated before almost all members of the UN agree Taiwan is part of China.
*Edit: On a personal level I don't actually agree with this. I don't want an invasion of Taiwan. I'm merely pointing out the "gotcha" you tried to set up doesn't actually make sense. Instead it's actually quite consistent with China's position on Taiwan.
*Edit 2: This is also why China seems petty and runs around making sure all nations that trade with China state there's only one China. That's what the whole Lithuania thing was about. China is stating if the majority of the UN believes in a 2 party solution, then the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves. Since the majority of UN believes in a 1 party solution for Taiwan, then it's the Taiwanese who are the occupiers and China has a right to defend itself.
*Edit 3: Ironically, the same cannot be said for China's consistency on the SCS. If you wanted a "gotcha" then China's claim to the SCS is absurd. But that said, they never said it was OK for them to be in an armed conflict over that. So I guess take that how you will.
18That fact that China is the one saying it has no impact on the validity of the argument.
15The CCP has only ever cared about the public face it presents.
Consistency between statements has never mattered.
-20this is pattently false, and this statement right here is why the PRC is able to run circles around the west, while also publishing 5 year plans on exactly what they are going to do and how they are going to do it. The west just pretends they are lieing
17
Ok sure. But attacking and killing civilians in their homes, in the streets and in festivals isn't exactly what I would call resisting oppression.
Israël is a fascist, ethno-theocratic apartheid state that lost all it's legitimacy with the current genocide they are perpetuating. But Hamas is a terrorist organization that needs to go. They are in no way helping nor represent Palestiniens in Gaza.
-14There is no such as a "civilian" in an occupying colony. Half the population in "israel" are military conscripts, and most of the other half are fascists and settlers just the same; there are very few people in the colony actually plotting/fighting against the state.
By your logic, the Viet Cong, which used the same tactics (attacking villages, taking hostages, using tunnels and guerilla warfare) and had the same goals (driving out foreign occupiers and reuniting their country) as Hamas, and the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, which (regardless of its intentions and goals) resulted in the deaths of thousands of Jews at the hands of the nazis similar to how Palestinians are being killed by "israel" now after the Oct 7 assault, were "terrorists" (whatever that even means).
Hamas is currently the largest Palestinian armed resistance group (and was even directly elected by the people of Gaza at that) and deserves everyone's support.
25
Ah, ole "Suppress hong Kong" china wants Palestine to have the right to armed resistance? Classic.
To be clear, they should, but fuck China.
-14
