The BBC Won't Use AI to Promote Doctor Who Again After Being Yelled at by Fans
The BBC Won't Use AI to Promote Doctor Who Again After Being Yelled at by Fans
The BBC announced its intent to experiment with generative AI weeks ago, only to learn that few forces on this Earth are as potent as annoyed Doctor Who fans
The backlash was immediate, but it didn’t stop the BBC from using text generated by LLMs—and purportedly checked and copy-edited by a human before approval—in two marketing emails and mobile push notifications to advertise Doctor Who. But now, the corporation will stop the experimentation entirely after a wave of official complaints pushed them to offer a response to concerned audiences.
There’s nothing wrong with using an LLM to help you brainstorm or write a draft of something. But, the end product needs to be original, or it will be obvious. Tools are tools. You don’t stop copy editing because a computer can check your spelling and grammar, so you can’t let “AI” have the final say.
Their mistake was thinking AI would be a good thing to mention.
101The best way to handle LLMs is to treat them like an intern. They're useful and can get a lot of work done, but you need to double check their work.
10
AI just helps people with their heads up their asses make bigger mistakes faster
75https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/comments/d1sm26/behold_the_ultimate_life_form/
I know, reddit. I couldn't find a better source for this image for some reason.
10Well said.
6
BBC from using text generated by LLMs—and purportedly checked and copy-edited by a human before approval—in two marketing emails and mobile push notifications to advertise Doctor Who.
If they're telling the truth then I don't really get what's wrong about that particular use
24They weren't just being cheap, they wanted to take human-written ads, auto-generate a million variations to send to individual people, then feed the ones that got clicks back in to train an AI clickbait generator. It also means the variations would be functionally watermarked so if anybody posted part of their text on Reddit or something the BBC could track who they sent that variation to.
7
Catgacating! Cartchy tuns!
18A pasadise of sweet teats!
13
Given how bad the show's writing has been for years and the declining in viewership in the Chibnell era, I'm actually surprised the BBC actually reversed course for once.
14it's crazy to me how bad the writing got. I just did a full rewatch to prep for Ncuti and it falls off a fucking cliff
3
I think that might make for interesting tv... one or more of the characters have dialog and action written by ai, and they have to deduce which are machines.
8How the mighty has fallen.
6That sums up the current AI situation pretty well. It‘s especially sad because so many (former) flagships of creativity like Wacom, LEGO, Disney or WotC are being caught using it, effectively burning down what was left of their legacy.
12Ironically I thought AI would be used by smaller teams or even single users like me to brainstorm or get new ideas, but it us being shamelesslu used by croporations who could afford to pay a full team of artists and still gain a lot of money, while indipendent artists and creators just refuse to use it up to that extent.
7
There is no mention of the quality of the marketing.
If it was made by an LLM, checked and it was at the quality of a human then what's the issue?
6Backlash over marketing....emails and texts? Y'all are trolling me, right?
2People are so dumb they make me actually side with a fucking company. Luddites used to be fun to make fun of until people started actually listening to them.
-55